From: DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ksmbd: destroy async_ida in ksmbd_conn_free()
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 20:02:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260419110255.2477785-3-charsyam@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260419110255.2477785-1-charsyam@gmail.com>
When per-connection async_ida was converted from a dynamically
allocated ksmbd_ida to an embedded struct ida, ksmbd_ida_free() was
removed from the connection teardown path but no matching
ida_destroy() was added. The connection is therefore freed with the
IDA's backing xarray still intact.
The kernel IDA API expects ida_init() and ida_destroy() to be paired
over an object's lifetime, so add the missing cleanup before the
connection is freed.
No leak has been observed in testing; this is a pairing fix to match
the IDA lifetime rules, not a response to a reproduced regression.
Fixes: d40012a83f87 ("cifsd: declare ida statically")
Signed-off-by: DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com>
---
fs/smb/server/connection.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/connection.c b/fs/smb/server/connection.c
index a4110c6cce37..8bbfe27387e3 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/connection.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/connection.c
@@ -98,6 +98,15 @@ void ksmbd_conn_free(struct ksmbd_conn *conn)
kfree(conn->preauth_info);
kfree(conn->mechToken);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&conn->refcnt)) {
+ /*
+ * async_ida is embedded in struct ksmbd_conn, so pair
+ * ida_destroy() with the final kfree() rather than with
+ * the unconditional field teardown above. This keeps
+ * the IDA valid for the entire lifetime of the struct,
+ * even while other refcount holders (oplock / vfs
+ * durable handles) still reference the connection.
+ */
+ ida_destroy(&conn->async_ida);
conn->transport->ops->free_transport(conn->transport);
kfree(conn);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-19 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-19 11:02 [PATCH 0/2] ksmbd: pair ida_init() with ida_destroy() in cleanup paths DaeMyung Kang
2026-04-19 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] ksmbd: destroy tree_conn_ida in ksmbd_session_destroy() DaeMyung Kang
2026-04-20 1:27 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-04-19 11:02 ` DaeMyung Kang [this message]
2026-04-20 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] ksmbd: destroy async_ida in ksmbd_conn_free() Namjae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260419110255.2477785-3-charsyam@gmail.com \
--to=charsyam@gmail.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox