From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@gmail.com>
Cc: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>,
osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gtp: disable BH before calling udp_tunnel_xmit_skb()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:58:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260420125815.3a920d9a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b44de581-9f41-4804-afb1-72c491d9443a@gmail.com>
On Mon, 20 Apr 2026 21:02:55 +0200 Justin Iurman wrote:
> On 4/17/26 07:54, David Carlier wrote:
> > gtp_genl_send_echo_req() runs as a generic netlink doit handler in
> > process context with BH not disabled. It calls udp_tunnel_xmit_skb(),
> > which eventually invokes iptunnel_xmit() — that uses __this_cpu_inc/dec
> > on softnet_data.xmit.recursion to track the tunnel xmit recursion level.
> >
> > Without local_bh_disable(), the task may migrate between
> > dev_xmit_recursion_inc() and dev_xmit_recursion_dec(), breaking the
> > per-CPU counter pairing. The result is stale or negative recursion
> > levels that can later produce false-positive
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_RECURSION_LIMIT drops on either CPU.
> >
> > The other udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() call sites in gtp.c are unaffected:
> > the data path runs under ndo_start_xmit and the echo response handlers
> > run from the UDP encap rx softirq, both with BH already disabled.
> >
> > Fix it by disabling BH around the udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() call, mirroring
> > commit 2cd7e6971fc2 ("sctp: disable BH before calling
> > udp_tunnel_xmit_skb()").
>
> Why not fix iptunnel_xmit() directly, rather than fixing all possible
> callers? Basically, jut like we did for lwtunnel_{output|xmit}(). The
> advantage would be that we no longer have to worry about BHs in the
> callers, and BHs would only be disabled when necessary.
Oops, I pushed this already. The bot hasn't caught up yet.
Let's revisit this if we find another caller in process context?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 5:54 [PATCH] gtp: disable BH before calling udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() David Carlier
2026-04-20 19:02 ` Justin Iurman
2026-04-20 19:44 ` David CARLIER
2026-04-20 19:58 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-20 21:59 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260420125815.3a920d9a@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=justin.iurman@gmail.com \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox