From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f73.google.com (mail-wr1-f73.google.com [209.85.221.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C952D0C94 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.73 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776698938; cv=none; b=Re75cYjX6xKH6tpDPOj/plyWUudZ1Qdkaeg6eI48fgwxvTlVk1Bj0h3yhxbWrlX3iLUcVajY1zf5UNyvPn0JzYE/X0v+r/+6i06Ey987K9h7SUvqSMGHeDY0o+wgYcWvDffE5+LZcYehn7BnR6xNU5RkvZ1TxFQaLXgGxCwc4E8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776698938; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j2lNLX27uSv94INu8iyMX5QdGDl/jTKWzG0XfROtqG4=; h=Date:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=EOptKww2pyqSo9U7/bxY2C0tpWAPCKo9gCQPuhgPTorkh1QbjZNp/GvDHk6pA8cMINCKbXAwCqjOHwFmr2n9RAw5+PJjkBCWBE9xS26MwL4oPlk6hPjaU8D30cBZiCTqlbhRsiZxrUbcwgr9G63SmEd4czhHCWZ42e6qa4PLyF8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--jpiecuch.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=iV3O0Xfm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.73 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--jpiecuch.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="iV3O0Xfm" Received: by mail-wr1-f73.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4411a572dc5so819407f8f.1 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:28:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1776698935; x=1777303735; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PDHIhd21CO55vv8wW1IQ7iOUTjYPhqTSEDEgVsLeO7M=; b=iV3O0XfmYsYzecBZpO0+126S/AvWoU2OeBEFxSSWqJDT5ICICmi8Aec2kSDZSQXUgN UpYF56s9w5Sr++OnxFLjUkoo8dbtRadwpx1/ra9iz6YaxLVSHBezXPIRxPw0l/jn2Rjt ARTfHRwvG+CeVsFVlU07cdLRETS6jw3jtFvL2of8SbIf1fQVe/Uo1WQwezW8F+cr2EvY qMgdS3CymTiL+IRcfPqijeEIktqEfwnOSYlO7BwzBw1VdUBCDzW2VGMJVOm3i3A3rT4q 7DOG6y6hfyR6Iqiqj8J1f+xwtYUbXVywIa+o7HccWtsQ7ZpksCW3eEqPx/mBv7DZ6zrn u8aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776698935; x=1777303735; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PDHIhd21CO55vv8wW1IQ7iOUTjYPhqTSEDEgVsLeO7M=; b=qIvezTWjH2poS6GDzyDYLtV3GVrh2N+Z6VEB0R1nKtED2jZW5FSS8IcBDEhHdycbSL JCqxfMrIBw4pXfB4SflmL4SyPKLnPB4uyJ63eTU6xquKnc4H8MOL+mjMemHHDlsiz08e eLYQbArDaPxwGlkgvhbUxnUm3mVTmQRs+P7cB+aHtXpmll4VM12XDJ6OBJ3BptFjwt9d ZTr13PH4S3za2Zm2ck6oi/fAeQk6zswAwkJqgiNblmnT0IGLDlcJqZt7RUOWvThoVKEb cj6rfBAL1tyg1l4GQCrod4Qs2//cjIjM0ayvJBCUltkHpZZZOj9ERwuIciCmE7xdmLx2 T9uw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQ70xFB7sOCM2T1m1xYI7U3TRoOWvuvcr1RZicDgcgJQ8Zgy4o Yv4kuPyWZnf8oTGKZVJDfqg91DyBd9Obsoksqp3NgaXgsK8PhrhqL2btPzk3SU9MpZVhPUD0Feu xASxRt0N+k0tFqQ== X-Received: from wrot16.prod.google.com ([2002:adf:f050:0:b0:43d:710b:a5d3]) (user=jpiecuch job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6000:1acd:b0:43b:4aba:8f38 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43fe3e14242mr22235488f8f.47.1776698934834; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:28:47 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0.rc1.555.g9c883467ad-goog Message-ID: <20260420152847.3690794-1-jpiecuch@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Documentation: add note about multiple ops.enqueue() calls in a row From: Kuba Piecuch To: Tejun Heo , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min , David Vernet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Kuba Piecuch , Cheng-Yang Chou Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Commit 84b1a0ea0b7c ("sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for user DSQs") introduced the possibility of ops.enqueue() being called multiple times in a row for the same task without intervening calls to ops.dequeue(). Document this behavior as it may be surprising to some. Acked-by: Andrea Righi Acked-by: Cheng-Yang Chou Signed-off-by: Kuba Piecuch --- Changes in v2: - Removed redundant line from commit description (Cheng-Yang) Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst index 03d595d178ea..fba09aa1cd4e 100644 --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst @@ -339,6 +339,11 @@ The following briefly shows how a waking task is scheduled and executed. leaves (e.g., when ``ops.dispatch()`` moves it to a terminal DSQ, or on property change / sleep). + Note that ``ops.enqueue()`` can be called multiple times in a row without + an intervening call to ``ops.dequeue()``. This can happen, for example, + when a task on a user-created DSQ is re-enqueued using + ``scx_bpf_dsq_reenq()``. The task stays in BPF custody the entire time. + When a task leaves BPF scheduler custody, ``ops.dequeue()`` is invoked. The dequeue can happen for different reasons, distinguished by flags: -- 2.54.0.rc1.555.g9c883467ad-goog