From: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] netlink: clean up failed initial dump-start state
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260420162734.854587-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com> (raw)
When __netlink_dump_start() has already installed cb->skb, taken the
module reference and set cb_running, a failure from the first
netlink_dump(sk, true) call returns via errout_skb without unwinding the
callback lifetime. That leaves cb_running set and defers module_put()
and consume_skb(cb->skb) until userspace drains the socket or closes it.
Share the normal callback teardown in a helper and use it on successful
completion and on the initial lock_taken=true failure path. Keep the
lock_taken=false continuation path unchanged, because recvmsg()-driven
retries legitimately preserve cb_running when they run out of receive
room.
Fixes: 16b304f3404f ("netlink: Eliminate kmalloc in netlink dump operation.")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5-4
Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
---
Validation inside a UML guest on current mainline:
- An unprivileged local task (uid=65534, no CAP_NET_ADMIN) opens a
plain NETLINK_ROUTE socket, preloads sk_rmem_alloc with echoed
NLMSG_ERROR replies from an unsupported rtnetlink type, then issues
RTM_GETLINK | NLM_F_DUMP | NLM_F_ACK.
- Stock kernel: the initial __netlink_dump_start() hits the rmem gate
and returns via errout_skb with cb_running stuck at 1 until
recvmsg() or close() drives forward progress.
- Patched kernel: the same probe leaves cb_running clear immediately
on the lock_taken=true failure, and the larger-rcvbuf continuation
path (legitimate dump in progress) is unchanged.
A scaling pass on 3500 such wedged sockets in a 256M UML guest shows
about 3.8-3.9 MiB of extra unreclaimable slab (/proc/meminfo
SUnreclaim) beyond the visible queued rmem on the vulnerable kernel,
roughly 1.1 KiB/socket. Real accumulation, but the test hits
RLIMIT_NOFILE long before the guest approaches OOM, so this still
looks like a local availability cleanup rather than an exhaustion
primitive.
No Cc: stable@ on the theory that the bug self-heals on
recvmsg()/close and the accumulation is mild. Happy to add it and
route to net if you'd rather see it backported.
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 4d609d5cf406..7019c17e6879 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -2250,6 +2250,20 @@ static int netlink_dump_done(struct netlink_sock *nlk, struct sk_buff *skb,
return 0;
}
+static void netlink_dump_cleanup(struct netlink_sock *nlk)
+{
+ struct module *module = nlk->cb.module;
+ struct sk_buff *skb = nlk->cb.skb;
+
+ if (nlk->cb.done)
+ nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(nlk->cb_running, false);
+ mutex_unlock(&nlk->nl_cb_mutex);
+ module_put(module);
+ consume_skb(skb);
+}
+
static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk, bool lock_taken)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
@@ -2258,7 +2272,6 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk, bool lock_taken)
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
unsigned int rmem, rcvbuf;
size_t max_recvmsg_len;
- struct module *module;
int err = -ENOBUFS;
int alloc_min_size;
int alloc_size;
@@ -2366,19 +2379,14 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk, bool lock_taken)
else
__netlink_sendskb(sk, skb);
- if (cb->done)
- cb->done(cb);
-
- WRITE_ONCE(nlk->cb_running, false);
- module = cb->module;
- skb = cb->skb;
- mutex_unlock(&nlk->nl_cb_mutex);
- module_put(module);
- consume_skb(skb);
+ netlink_dump_cleanup(nlk);
return 0;
errout_skb:
- mutex_unlock(&nlk->nl_cb_mutex);
+ if (lock_taken)
+ netlink_dump_cleanup(nlk);
+ else
+ mutex_unlock(&nlk->nl_cb_mutex);
kfree_skb(skb);
return err;
}
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 16:27 Michael Bommarito [this message]
2026-04-20 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next] netlink: clean up failed initial dump-start state Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-20 17:56 ` Michael Bommarito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260420162734.854587-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--to=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangfeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox