From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B7A38551B; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776753782; cv=none; b=dTA84qA/FZhQH3d+VXl18SyoBLew+EqEamIQJ4tIMYAhkkdefH99DctwGVJSBbrMCB8gEV03QoNVwaqz4TuFfaTUXQ7MfyDU/6RsNRVtfiFyzsEslFTpMTCvbfB7l+OkxLeEAieiuzr4rK3KjvkfI5RAKw4iMMBNHiP4XkSGLk0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776753782; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+MC0VLO/5xN6sdY91VyR/ISR9nKdYE0oh1/DFy/Bpmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CXVLJ5TvtCroOBVDBx6kFvxNgzm5WC3HvZ4mvJN5E4HM4EX/4t0CKCb31Zv5ymWYYaAHOI3G8rIQTV6pCdGptJ/MrgfXTHIrGecaH4uV6/deMZOpG+UkYQwIXmPg/+InMDeKr17JJYk95DzgcgO10ArfOfpKCoDIcZo9Cr2gJAU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=2n/+xO3X; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="2n/+xO3X" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCD8FC2BCB5; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:43:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1776753782; bh=+MC0VLO/5xN6sdY91VyR/ISR9nKdYE0oh1/DFy/Bpmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2n/+xO3XmaPoiP+4ofBJqDd+wMUEPy5OthaWOapYXoTuPx/iNFL/ivpH7yVRWiJzR 4F9J2B/btOJoTgUgFDu0Z4rkGaEf1RaEaA9CHnG8DDqdVfSj2/9dx1eyimInNHjWwD w+xTd2Qd8cabOLJIY5Bg+x1xuReJ2hF2s6jnEKo0= Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:42:28 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Hanabishi , Eric Naim , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux kernel regressions list Subject: Re: [tip: timers/urgent] clockevents: Add missing resets of the next_event_forced flag Message-ID: <2026042105-malformed-probation-232b@gregkh> References: <87340xfeje.ffs@tglx> <177636758252.1323100.5283878386670888513.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <5cbb14d8-46f9-4197-917f-51da852d7500@leemhuis.info> <87mrywdeen.ffs@tglx> <2026042110-surpass-petite-9551@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2026042110-surpass-petite-9551@gregkh> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 08:41:17AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 08:26:35AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 4/21/26 08:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 19 2026 at 17:11, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > > >> On 4/16/26 21:26, tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >>> The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip: > > >>> > > >>> Commit-ID: 4096fd0e8eaea13ebe5206700b33f49635ae18e5 > > >>> Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4096fd0e8eaea13ebe5206700b33f49635ae18e5 > > >>> Author: Thomas Gleixner > > >>> AuthorDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:55:01 +02:00 > > >>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner > > >>> CommitterDate: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:22:04 +02:00 > > >>> > > >>> clockevents: Add missing resets of the next_event_forced flag > > >> > > >> Just wondering: what's the plan to mainline this? I wonder if this is > > >> worth mainlining rather quickly and the tell the stable team right > > >> afterwards to queue it up for 7.0.1, as in addition to the two affected > > >> people in this thread (one of which stated that "several users from > > >> CachyOS reported this regression as well") I noticed three more 7.0 bug > > >> reports in the past few days that likely are fixed by the quoted patch: > > > > > > It's in Linus tree and I asked the stable folks to withhold the original > > > patch which it fixes, so they can queue both at once. > > > > Yeah, I noticed, and many thx! Also many thx for planning the backport, > > this is great. But that "original patch" is already in 7.0, which makes > > me wonder: > > > > Should we ask Greg (now CCed) to include a backport (once it exists) for > > 7.0.1, even if that is in testing already and might mean that this needs > > another stable-rc or delayed? Because in addition to those three reports > > I mentioned earlier I noticed one more today: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221377 > > > > And maybe this is the same issue, too: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221388 > > > > IOW: quite a few people are hitting this. > > I've already dropped this from all of the other stable queues. If you > want me to pick up something from linux-next now, for 7.0.1, I'll be > glad to do so, just let me know. Ah, nevermind, I see Thomas sent this right before I wrote this email, I'll go pick it up after my morning coffee kicks in :) thanks, greg k-h