From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.tuxedocomputers.com (mail.tuxedocomputers.com [157.90.84.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CAD3DD53E; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=157.90.84.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776802277; cv=none; b=lKe/5OXImxij0gq2hKkdmt10uX5MIflVMDQMlm31/DjUPFvBskOeInvJHbeUq6+wmfDpLWKX2zTCVo5RPC5n/C40ZMSk4NWK6imt1FV15zC5MoHAqcEHKn6W6ADekME+skuNAtPpAUwVN0SgEjSj69k3IhLqndHPFeHaywCxWfw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776802277; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BMmGHqnU0VbT7a2h4q26RIinQIPIg+3Qu3IFaMBEbZQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=nm+XwbTBVAPX1dlqmgfFZXwtxJFKsAGySQVyxIMqYu2kZ5ScoFDzLW81G7kA3nXGj6+mcsFn2WqqJkle643+byBo2ao23Gz10F4UMQPW+GZhAYn7BWs4KRCYSmMQVUSQqdZTJBonnv5ErUXg3zDbnuYqebSPrn7ClQ4IlpqNHD4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=tuxedocomputers.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tuxedocomputers.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=tuxedocomputers.com header.i=@tuxedocomputers.com header.b=UI/pxU/8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=157.90.84.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=tuxedocomputers.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tuxedocomputers.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=tuxedocomputers.com header.i=@tuxedocomputers.com header.b="UI/pxU/8" Received: from wse-pc.fritz.box (i5C75F683.versanet.de [92.117.246.131]) (Authenticated sender: wse@tuxedocomputers.com) by mail.tuxedocomputers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B857C2FC0223; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:11:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxedocomputers.com; s=default; t=1776802266; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=17SF+WJJu5Owo9PF3gA+zi4NQqL9YV7WDcVIq+J7TYs=; b=UI/pxU/8PokNMdIieXYu6pHyaBEtep1hTjHEiieA5Eqz6wbx7OWr0IEflBD+qDWScu20mQ lJpMX9Zs62PTo8UBdOuonAGk6a/noeWj47GTfakbz5lQ2JJ2flHEAczroLvxoHts+wHlOI yl/xwOLSJYjUlwto3OHg67Bw+nlHZdc= Authentication-Results: mail.tuxedocomputers.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=wse@tuxedocomputers.com smtp.mailfrom=wse@tuxedocomputers.com From: Werner Sembach To: W_Armin@gmx.de, hansg@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Werner Sembach Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Another improvement and another feature Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:01:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20260421201103.142403-1-wse@tuxedocomputers.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, This series is based on another not yet accepted series https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260417050912.5582-1-W_Armin@gmx.de/ RFC because of that, because the third patch is not yet tested, and because I have a question regarding the 3rd patch: Should I abstract the call to wmi_evaluate_method away in a wrapper function in uniwill-wmi somehow, or is it ok to have it straight in the uniwill-laptop code like that? It is quite self contained. Best regards, Werner Werner Sembach (3): platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Make super key init lineup with other inits platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Implement lightbar for XMG Fusion (L19) platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: Offer support to activate local dimming drivers/platform/x86/uniwill/uniwill-acpi.c | 195 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 182 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0