From: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, emil@etsalapatis.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] sched_ext: Relocate cpu_acquire/cpu_release to end of struct sched_ext_ops
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:58:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421215030.G7d71@cchengyang.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421071945.3110084-5-tj@kernel.org>
Hi Tejun,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 09:19:33PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> cpu_acquire and cpu_release are deprecated and slated for removal. Move
> their declarations to the end of struct sched_ext_ops so an upcoming
> cid-form struct (sched_ext_ops_cid) can omit them entirely without
> disturbing the offsets of the shared fields.
>
> Switch the two SCX_HAS_OP() callers for these ops to direct field checks
> since the relocated ops sit outside the SCX_OPI_END range covered by the
> has_op bitmap.
>
> scx_kf_allow_flags[] auto-sizes to the highest used SCX_OP_IDX, so
> SCX_OP_IDX(cpu_release) moving to a higher index just enlarges the
> sparse array; the lookup logic is unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 4 +--
> kernel/sched/ext_internal.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 9e802d73f205..74e4271e44e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -2813,7 +2813,7 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> * core. This callback complements ->cpu_release(), which is
> * emitted in switch_class().
> */
> - if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, cpu_acquire))
> + if (sch->ops.cpu_acquire)
> SCX_CALL_OP(sch, cpu_acquire, rq, cpu, NULL);
> rq->scx.cpu_released = false;
> }
> @@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ static void switch_class(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
> * next time that balance_one() is invoked.
> */
> if (!rq->scx.cpu_released) {
> - if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, cpu_release)) {
> + if (sch->ops.cpu_release) {
> struct scx_cpu_release_args args = {
> .reason = preempt_reason_from_class(next_class),
> .task = next,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> index 350b84876b2a..1d73fcc19aaf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> @@ -555,28 +555,6 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
> */
> void (*update_idle)(s32 cpu, bool idle);
>
> - /**
> - * @cpu_acquire: A CPU is becoming available to the BPF scheduler
> - * @cpu: The CPU being acquired by the BPF scheduler.
> - * @args: Acquire arguments, see the struct definition.
> - *
> - * A CPU that was previously released from the BPF scheduler is now once
> - * again under its control.
> - */
> - void (*cpu_acquire)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_acquire_args *args);
> -
> - /**
> - * @cpu_release: A CPU is taken away from the BPF scheduler
> - * @cpu: The CPU being released by the BPF scheduler.
> - * @args: Release arguments, see the struct definition.
> - *
> - * The specified CPU is no longer under the control of the BPF
> - * scheduler. This could be because it was preempted by a higher
> - * priority sched_class, though there may be other reasons as well. The
> - * caller should consult @args->reason to determine the cause.
> - */
> - void (*cpu_release)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_release_args *args);
> -
> /**
> * @init_task: Initialize a task to run in a BPF scheduler
> * @p: task to initialize for BPF scheduling
> @@ -867,6 +845,38 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
>
> /* internal use only, must be NULL */
> void __rcu *priv;
> +
> + /*
> + * Deprecated callbacks. Kept at the end of the struct so the cid-form
> + * struct (sched_ext_ops_cid) can omit them without affecting the
> + * shared field offsets. Use SCX_ENQ_IMMED instead. Sitting past
> + * SCX_OPI_END means has_op doesn't cover them, so SCX_HAS_OP() cannot
> + * be used; callers must test sch->ops.cpu_acquire / cpu_release
> + * directly.
> + */
> +
> + /**
> + * @cpu_acquire: A CPU is becoming available to the BPF scheduler
> + * @cpu: The CPU being acquired by the BPF scheduler.
> + * @args: Acquire arguments, see the struct definition.
> + *
> + * A CPU that was previously released from the BPF scheduler is now once
> + * again under its control. Deprecated; use SCX_ENQ_IMMED instead.
> + */
> + void (*cpu_acquire)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_acquire_args *args);
> +
> + /**
> + * @cpu_release: A CPU is taken away from the BPF scheduler
> + * @cpu: The CPU being released by the BPF scheduler.
> + * @args: Release arguments, see the struct definition.
> + *
> + * The specified CPU is no longer under the control of the BPF
> + * scheduler. This could be because it was preempted by a higher
> + * priority sched_class, though there may be other reasons as well. The
> + * caller should consult @args->reason to determine the cause.
> + * Deprecated; use SCX_ENQ_IMMED instead.
> + */
> + void (*cpu_release)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_release_args *args);
> };
>
> enum scx_opi {
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
--
Cheers,
Cheng-Yang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 7:19 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Topological CPU IDs and cid-form struct_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 01/16] sched_ext: Rename ops_cpu_valid() to scx_cpu_valid() and expose it Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:31 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 02/16] sched_ext: Move scx_exit(), scx_error() and friends to ext_internal.h Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:36 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 03/16] sched_ext: Shift scx_kick_cpu() validity check to scx_bpf_kick_cpu() Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:49 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 04/16] sched_ext: Relocate cpu_acquire/cpu_release to end of struct sched_ext_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:58 ` Cheng-Yang Chou [this message]
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 05/16] sched_ext: Make scx_enable() take scx_enable_cmd Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 14:25 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 06/16] sched_ext: Add topological CPU IDs (cids) Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 sched_ext/for-7.2] " Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 07/16] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_cid_override() kfunc Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 08/16] tools/sched_ext: Add struct_size() helpers to common.bpf.h Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 09/16] sched_ext: Add cmask, a base-windowed bitmap over cid space Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 17:30 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 23:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 10/16] sched_ext: Add cid-form kfunc wrappers alongside cpu-form Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 11/16] sched_ext: Add bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid struct_ops type Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 12/16] sched_ext: Forbid cpu-form kfuncs from cid-form schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 13/16] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap: Restart on hotplug instead of cpu_online/offline Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 14/16] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap: Add cmask-based idle tracking and cid-based idle pick Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 15/16] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap: Port to cid-form struct_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 7:19 ` [PATCH 16/16] sched_ext: Require cid-form struct_ops for sub-sched support Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 18:18 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Topological CPU IDs and cid-form struct_ops Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-22 1:23 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260421215030.G7d71@cchengyang.duckdns.org \
--to=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox