public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
	 sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, emil@etsalapatis.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
	Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] sched_ext: Relocate cpu_acquire/cpu_release to end of struct sched_ext_ops
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:58:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421215030.G7d71@cchengyang.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421071945.3110084-5-tj@kernel.org>

Hi Tejun,

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 09:19:33PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> cpu_acquire and cpu_release are deprecated and slated for removal. Move
> their declarations to the end of struct sched_ext_ops so an upcoming
> cid-form struct (sched_ext_ops_cid) can omit them entirely without
> disturbing the offsets of the shared fields.
> 
> Switch the two SCX_HAS_OP() callers for these ops to direct field checks
> since the relocated ops sit outside the SCX_OPI_END range covered by the
> has_op bitmap.
> 
> scx_kf_allow_flags[] auto-sizes to the highest used SCX_OP_IDX, so
> SCX_OP_IDX(cpu_release) moving to a higher index just enlarges the
> sparse array; the lookup logic is unchanged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c          |  4 +--
>  kernel/sched/ext_internal.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 9e802d73f205..74e4271e44e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -2813,7 +2813,7 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
>  		 * core. This callback complements ->cpu_release(), which is
>  		 * emitted in switch_class().
>  		 */
> -		if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, cpu_acquire))
> +		if (sch->ops.cpu_acquire)
>  			SCX_CALL_OP(sch, cpu_acquire, rq, cpu, NULL);
>  		rq->scx.cpu_released = false;
>  	}
> @@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ static void switch_class(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
>  	 *  next time that balance_one() is invoked.
>  	 */
>  	if (!rq->scx.cpu_released) {
> -		if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, cpu_release)) {
> +		if (sch->ops.cpu_release) {
>  			struct scx_cpu_release_args args = {
>  				.reason = preempt_reason_from_class(next_class),
>  				.task = next,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> index 350b84876b2a..1d73fcc19aaf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> @@ -555,28 +555,6 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
>  	 */
>  	void (*update_idle)(s32 cpu, bool idle);
>  
> -	/**
> -	 * @cpu_acquire: A CPU is becoming available to the BPF scheduler
> -	 * @cpu: The CPU being acquired by the BPF scheduler.
> -	 * @args: Acquire arguments, see the struct definition.
> -	 *
> -	 * A CPU that was previously released from the BPF scheduler is now once
> -	 * again under its control.
> -	 */
> -	void (*cpu_acquire)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_acquire_args *args);
> -
> -	/**
> -	 * @cpu_release: A CPU is taken away from the BPF scheduler
> -	 * @cpu: The CPU being released by the BPF scheduler.
> -	 * @args: Release arguments, see the struct definition.
> -	 *
> -	 * The specified CPU is no longer under the control of the BPF
> -	 * scheduler. This could be because it was preempted by a higher
> -	 * priority sched_class, though there may be other reasons as well. The
> -	 * caller should consult @args->reason to determine the cause.
> -	 */
> -	void (*cpu_release)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_release_args *args);
> -
>  	/**
>  	 * @init_task: Initialize a task to run in a BPF scheduler
>  	 * @p: task to initialize for BPF scheduling
> @@ -867,6 +845,38 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
>  
>  	/* internal use only, must be NULL */
>  	void __rcu *priv;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Deprecated callbacks. Kept at the end of the struct so the cid-form
> +	 * struct (sched_ext_ops_cid) can omit them without affecting the
> +	 * shared field offsets. Use SCX_ENQ_IMMED instead. Sitting past
> +	 * SCX_OPI_END means has_op doesn't cover them, so SCX_HAS_OP() cannot
> +	 * be used; callers must test sch->ops.cpu_acquire / cpu_release
> +	 * directly.
> +	 */
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @cpu_acquire: A CPU is becoming available to the BPF scheduler
> +	 * @cpu: The CPU being acquired by the BPF scheduler.
> +	 * @args: Acquire arguments, see the struct definition.
> +	 *
> +	 * A CPU that was previously released from the BPF scheduler is now once
> +	 * again under its control. Deprecated; use SCX_ENQ_IMMED instead.
> +	 */
> +	void (*cpu_acquire)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_acquire_args *args);
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @cpu_release: A CPU is taken away from the BPF scheduler
> +	 * @cpu: The CPU being released by the BPF scheduler.
> +	 * @args: Release arguments, see the struct definition.
> +	 *
> +	 * The specified CPU is no longer under the control of the BPF
> +	 * scheduler. This could be because it was preempted by a higher
> +	 * priority sched_class, though there may be other reasons as well. The
> +	 * caller should consult @args->reason to determine the cause.
> +	 * Deprecated; use SCX_ENQ_IMMED instead.
> +	 */
> +	void (*cpu_release)(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_release_args *args);
>  };
>  
>  enum scx_opi {
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 
> 

-- 
Cheers,
Cheng-Yang

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21  7:19 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Topological CPU IDs and cid-form struct_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 01/16] sched_ext: Rename ops_cpu_valid() to scx_cpu_valid() and expose it Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:31   ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 02/16] sched_ext: Move scx_exit(), scx_error() and friends to ext_internal.h Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:36   ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 03/16] sched_ext: Shift scx_kick_cpu() validity check to scx_bpf_kick_cpu() Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:49   ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 04/16] sched_ext: Relocate cpu_acquire/cpu_release to end of struct sched_ext_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 13:58   ` Cheng-Yang Chou [this message]
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 05/16] sched_ext: Make scx_enable() take scx_enable_cmd Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 14:25   ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 06/16] sched_ext: Add topological CPU IDs (cids) Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 17:15   ` [PATCH v2 sched_ext/for-7.2] " Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 07/16] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_cid_override() kfunc Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 08/16] tools/sched_ext: Add struct_size() helpers to common.bpf.h Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 09/16] sched_ext: Add cmask, a base-windowed bitmap over cid space Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 17:30   ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 23:21   ` [PATCH v2] " Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 10/16] sched_ext: Add cid-form kfunc wrappers alongside cpu-form Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 11/16] sched_ext: Add bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid struct_ops type Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 12/16] sched_ext: Forbid cpu-form kfuncs from cid-form schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 13/16] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap: Restart on hotplug instead of cpu_online/offline Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 14/16] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap: Add cmask-based idle tracking and cid-based idle pick Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 15/16] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap: Port to cid-form struct_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-21  7:19 ` [PATCH 16/16] sched_ext: Require cid-form struct_ops for sub-sched support Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 18:18 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Topological CPU IDs and cid-form struct_ops Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-21 18:33   ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-22  1:23     ` Cheng-Yang Chou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260421215030.G7d71@cchengyang.duckdns.org \
    --to=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox