Re: [PATCH 7.2 v10 0/2] skip redundant sync IPIs when TLB flush sent them

David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24T19:25:04Z

On 4/24/26 21:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 09:09:21PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>
>> Forcing contributors to reply to everything. I don't like that, in particular
>> not as long as there is no way for contributors to run it early in private.
>>
>> In most cases, contributors just do the reasonable thing: incorporate the
>> feedback in a new version.
>
> Yes, so I understand that you can run it locally, but then you get to
> pay for the tokens (and sashiko burns tokens like dry grass). I also
> understand why Google/LF doesn't open this up, its a money pit no doubt.

Indeed.

>
> OTOH, I see this causing more reposts of series than we would have had
> previously -- and we all love more versions of series.

Fortunately, reposts are easy to review, at least for me, when tags are properly
incorporated and the version diff properly describes the changes.

>
> I'm not sure I see a solution, other than to read less email -- its not
> like I can even begin to read all email I get anyway.

Sad but true.

I consider the last AI review before something gets merged the most important one.

--
Cheers,

David