public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
To: "Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol" <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jonathan Marek" <jonathan@marek.ca>,
	"Brian Masney" <masneyb@onstation.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: fix unbalanced regulator_disable calls, when probe fails
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:23:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260426112334.3938774-2-andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260426112334.3938774-1-andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>

During a probe functions after all regulators are enabled, runtime pm
is enabled. Before probe function finishes, runtime pm triggers and
disables vddio regulator. When probe function fails after that,
inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action tries to disable already
disabled by runtime pm vddio regulator causing following backtrace:

  inv-mpu6050-i2c 1-0068: trigger probe fail -19
  WARNING: drivers/regulator/core.c:3244 at _regulator_disable+0x2ac/0x600
  Call trace:
   _regulator_disable+0x2ac/0x600 (P)
   regulator_disable+0xac/0x148
   inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio_action+0x3c/0xb0 [inv_mpu6050]
   devm_action_release+0x4c/0x88
   release_nodes+0xd8/0x178
   devres_release_group+0x214/0x3c8
   i2c_device_probe+0x6fc/0x9b0
  ...
  inv-mpu6050-i2c 1-0068: Failed to disable vddio regulator: -5

vddio state is handled in two places: pm_runtime and
inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio_action devm action.
inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio_action has to check, whether
regulator is disabled by pm_runtime already. But this information is
available only after pm_runtime state is initialized by
pm_runtime_set_active during a probe. So
inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio_action has to be called only
after pm_runtime is properly initialized. To handle cases, when probe
fails before pm_runtime is enabled, explicitly disable regulators
in error paths.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
Fixes: 07c12b1c007c ("iio: imu: mpu6050: add support for regulator framework")
---

Changes in v3:
 - make patch to be the first patch of the patchset for easier backporting
 - update commit message to fix Andy's comment
 - don't move pm_runtime_set_active from pm_runtime initialization,
   move activation of inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action instead

Changes in v2:
 - minimize call trace in commit message
 - include specific driver name in patch subject

 drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 25 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
index 5796896d54cd8..49fdf33adec99 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
@@ -1862,6 +1862,7 @@ static int inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st)
 static void inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action(void *_data)
 {
 	struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = _data;
+	struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(st->map);
 	int result;
 
 	result = regulator_disable(st->vdd_supply);
@@ -1869,7 +1870,8 @@ static void inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action(void *_data)
 		dev_err(regmap_get_device(st->map),
 			"Failed to disable vdd regulator: %d\n", result);
 
-	inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio(st);
+	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
+		inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio(st);
 }
 
 static void inv_mpu_pm_disable(void *data)
@@ -1976,23 +1978,15 @@ int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
 		return result;
 	}
 
-	result = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action,
-				 st);
-	if (result) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Failed to setup regulator cleanup action %d\n",
-			result);
-		return result;
-	}
-
 	/* fill magnetometer orientation */
 	result = inv_mpu_magn_set_orient(st);
 	if (result)
-		return result;
+		goto error_vddio_off;
 
 	/* power is turned on inside check chip type*/
 	result = inv_check_and_setup_chip(st);
 	if (result)
-		return result;
+		goto error_vddio_off;
 
 	result = inv_mpu6050_init_config(indio_dev);
 	if (result) {
@@ -2018,6 +2012,12 @@ int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
 	result = pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
 	if (result)
 		goto error_power_off;
+
+	result = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action,
+					  st);
+	if (result)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, result,
+				     "Failed to setup regulator cleanup action\n");
 	pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 	pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, INV_MPU6050_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS);
@@ -2114,6 +2114,9 @@ int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
 
 error_power_off:
 	inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, false);
+error_vddio_off:
+	inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_vddio(st);
+	regulator_disable(st->vdd_supply);
 	return result;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(inv_mpu_core_probe, "IIO_MPU6050");
-- 
2.53.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-26 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-26 11:23 [PATCH v3 0/3] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: runtime pm fixes Andrey Skvortsov
2026-04-26 11:23 ` Andrey Skvortsov [this message]
2026-04-26 14:43   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: fix unbalanced regulator_disable calls, when probe fails Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-26 20:25     ` Andrey Skvortsov
2026-04-27  9:04       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-27  8:28   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-26 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: use devres-enabled version of pm_runtime_enable Andrey Skvortsov
2026-04-26 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: control vdd supply using devm-helpers Andrey Skvortsov
2026-04-26 14:44   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260426112334.3938774-2-andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
    --to=andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox