From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next] wifi: rt2x00: check for of_get_mac_address error
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:54:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427105445.GA2620@wp.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2263e4917557cb1e07a56c3bfb9a0507bf81f00.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 12:45:14PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-04-27 at 09:32 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 10:16:52PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > is_valid_ether_addr is already a check of of_get_mac_address, in which
> > > case it returns an error if false. Just set a random MAC on all errors
> > > except for EPROBE_DEFER.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
>
> Are you sure? I just randomly checked one caller to see what the
> *eeprom_mac_addr would contain, and I see
>
> mac = rt2x00_eeprom_addr(rt2x00dev, EEPROM_MAC_ADDR_0);
> rt2x00lib_set_mac_address(rt2x00dev, mac);
>
> so that case assumes it can get it from EEPROM and override with OF, but
> if OF fails then it would still use the EEPROM address as long as it's
> valid ...
You have right, please drop the patch.
BTW, the code should be changed to move getting the address from OF
out of _set routine.
Regards
Stanislaw
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 5:16 [PATCH wireless-next] wifi: rt2x00: check for of_get_mac_address error Rosen Penev
2026-04-27 7:32 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2026-04-27 10:45 ` Johannes Berg
2026-04-27 10:54 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427105445.GA2620@wp.pl \
--to=stf_xl@wp.pl \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox