From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@google.com>,
Sonam Sanju <sonam.sanju@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>, hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched: proxy-exec: Close race causing workqueue work being delayed
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:38:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427183848.698551-2-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427183848.698551-1-jstultz@google.com>
Vineeth reported seeing a KVM related deadlock connected to work
queue lockups using the android17-6.18 tree, which has
Proxy Execution enabled (using the full patch stack), but I've
subsequently reproduced it on v7.1-rc1.
On further debugging he found:
- kvm-irqfd-cleanup workqueue and rcu_gp lands in a per-cpu
pwq(work queue pool)
- one of kvm-irqfd-cleanup worker(say A) takes a mutex and then
calls synchronize_srcu_expedited()
- one other kvm-irqfd-cleanup worker worker(Say B) tries to
acquire the lock and then gets blocked
- On the way to blocking, this cpu gets an IPI and on return
from IPI, it calls __schedule() and did not get to complete
workqueue accounting(worker->sleeping = 0 and decrementing
pool->nr_running). This is done in sched_submit_work() ->
wq_worker_sleeping() called from schedule() and we got
preempted before that.
- proxy execution doesn't immediately take it off run queue as
p->blocked_on is set during __mutex_lock
- Next time when B is picked for running, it notices A(mutex
holder) is not on a runqueue and then blocks B.
find_proxy_task() -> proxy_deactivate() -> block_task()
- And things are then stuck. A is waiting for the workqueue to
be run, but B can't run the workqueue as it is blocked on A.
The trouble is that with Proxy Execution, in
__mutex_lock_common() we set the task state to
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, and set blocked_on before calling into
schedule(), where sched_submit_work() will be called.
But if an IPI comes in before we call schedule() the interrupt
will call __schedule(SM_PREEMPT) directly. This causes the
scheduler to see the current task as blocked_on, and deactivate
it (because the owner is off the runqueue).
Since its deactivated, it wont' be run, and it won't get to
call sched_submit_work().
Without proxy-execution, the SM_PREEMPT case will prevent the
task from being dequeued, and it can be reselected again and
run, which will allow it to finish calling into schedule()
and calling sched_submit_work() before actually blocking.
So we need to make sure on the SM_PREEMPT case, if current is
marked as blocked_on, we should clear the blocked_on state and
mark the task RUNNABLE so the task can be selected to complete
its call to schedule() -> sched_submit_work().
Now because we cleared BLOCKED_ON and set the task RUNNABLE,
the task will be able to be selected and run again and loop back
in __mutex_lock_common() where it can re-set the blocked_on
state and call back into schedule() in order to properly be
chosen as a donor.
Many thanks to Vineeth for figuring this very obscure race out
and for implementing a test tool to make it easily reproducible!
Reported-by: Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@google.com>
Tested-by: Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
Cc: Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@google.com>
Cc: Sonam Sanju <sonam.sanju@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Cc: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index da20fb6ea25ae..5f684caefd8b2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7097,6 +7097,17 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
try_to_block_task(rq, prev, &prev_state,
!task_is_blocked(prev));
switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
+ } else if (preempt && prev->blocked_on) {
+ /*
+ * If we are SM_PREEMPT, we may have interrupted
+ * after blocked_on was set, before schedule()
+ * was run, preventing workques from running. So
+ * clear blocked_on and mark task RUNNING so it
+ * can be reselected to run and complete its
+ * logic
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(prev->__state, TASK_RUNNING);
+ clear_task_blocked_on(prev, NULL);
}
pick_again:
--
2.54.0.545.g6539524ca2-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 18:38 [PATCH 0/2] Proxy Execution fixes for v7.1-rc John Stultz
2026-04-27 18:38 ` John Stultz [this message]
2026-04-28 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: proxy-exec: Close race causing workqueue work being delayed K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-28 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-28 13:15 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28 14:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-27 18:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] locking: mutex: Fix proxy-exec potentially deactivating tasks marked TASK_RUNNING John Stultz
2026-04-28 8:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28 19:50 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427183848.698551-2-jstultz@google.com \
--to=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hupu.gm@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=kunwu.chan@linux.dev \
--cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sonam.sanju@intel.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethrp@google.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox