public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
	Felix Abecassis <fabecassis@nvidia.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] sched/fair: Use guard(rcu) for sched_domain RCU sections
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:16:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428051720.3180182-2-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428051720.3180182-1-arighi@nvidia.com>

Use the scoped guard(rcu)() helper to safely access sched_domain
pointers.

No functional change intended, this is preparation for topology work
where sched_domain lifetimes are easier to reason about with explicit,
scope-bounded RCU critical sections.

Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 69361c63353ad..fc0828150c780 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8083,6 +8083,8 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 	 */
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
+	guard(rcu)();
+
 	if (choose_idle_cpu(target, p) &&
 	    asym_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, target))
 		return target;
@@ -12701,55 +12703,16 @@ static void kick_ilb(unsigned int flags)
 }
 
 /*
- * Current decision point for kicking the idle load balancer in the presence
- * of idle CPUs in the system.
+ * Decide whether the ILB needs a stats and/or balance kick based on
+ * sched_domain state.
  */
-static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
+static bool nohz_balancer_needs_kick(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	unsigned long now = jiffies;
 	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 	int nr_busy, i, cpu = rq->cpu;
-	unsigned int flags = 0;
-
-	if (unlikely(rq->idle_balance))
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * We may be recently in ticked or tickless idle mode. At the first
-	 * busy tick after returning from idle, we will update the busy stats.
-	 */
-	nohz_balance_exit_idle(rq);
-
-	if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
-	    time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
-		flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
-
-	/*
-	 * Most of the time system is not 100% busy. i.e nohz.nr_cpus > 0
-	 * Skip the read if time is not due.
-	 *
-	 * If none are in tickless mode, there maybe a narrow window
-	 * (28 jiffies, HZ=1000) where flags maybe set and kick_ilb called.
-	 * But idle load balancing is not done as find_new_ilb fails.
-	 * That's very rare. So read nohz.nr_cpus only if time is due.
-	 */
-	if (time_before(now, nohz.next_balance))
-		goto out;
 
-	/*
-	 * None are in tickless mode and hence no need for NOHZ idle load
-	 * balancing
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(nohz.idle_cpus_mask)))
-		return;
-
-	if (rq->nr_running >= 2) {
-		flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	guard(rcu)();
 
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
 	if (sd) {
@@ -12757,10 +12720,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * If there's a runnable CFS task and the current CPU has reduced
 		 * capacity, kick the ILB to see if there's a better CPU to run on:
 		 */
-		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable >= 1 && check_cpu_capacity(rq, sd)) {
-			flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-			goto unlock;
-		}
+		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable >= 1 && check_cpu_capacity(rq, sd))
+			return true;
 	}
 
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
@@ -12774,10 +12735,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * preferred CPU must be idle.
 		 */
 		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
-			if (sched_asym(sd, i, cpu)) {
-				flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-				goto unlock;
-			}
+			if (sched_asym(sd, i, cpu))
+				return true;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -12787,10 +12746,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * When ASYM_CPUCAPACITY; see if there's a higher capacity CPU
 		 * to run the misfit task on.
 		 */
-		if (check_misfit_status(rq)) {
-			flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-			goto unlock;
-		}
+		if (check_misfit_status(rq))
+			return true;
 
 		/*
 		 * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
@@ -12799,7 +12756,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 *
 		 * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
 		 */
-		goto unlock;
+		return false;
 	}
 
 	sds = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
@@ -12814,13 +12771,61 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
 		 */
 		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
-		if (nr_busy > 1) {
-			flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
-			goto unlock;
-		}
+		if (nr_busy > 1)
+			return true;
 	}
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Current decision point for kicking the idle load balancer in the presence
+ * of idle CPUs in the system.
+ */
+static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	unsigned long now = jiffies;
+	unsigned int flags = 0;
+
+	if (unlikely(rq->idle_balance))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * We may be recently in ticked or tickless idle mode. At the first
+	 * busy tick after returning from idle, we will update the busy stats.
+	 */
+	nohz_balance_exit_idle(rq);
+
+	if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
+	    time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
+		flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
+
+	/*
+	 * Most of the time system is not 100% busy. i.e nohz.nr_cpus > 0
+	 * Skip the read if time is not due.
+	 *
+	 * If none are in tickless mode, there maybe a narrow window
+	 * (28 jiffies, HZ=1000) where flags maybe set and kick_ilb called.
+	 * But idle load balancing is not done as find_new_ilb fails.
+	 * That's very rare. So read nohz.nr_cpus only if time is due.
+	 */
+	if (time_before(now, nohz.next_balance))
+		goto out;
+
+	/*
+	 * None are in tickless mode and hence no need for NOHZ idle load
+	 * balancing
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(nohz.idle_cpus_mask)))
+		return;
+
+	if (rq->nr_running >= 2) {
+		flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (nohz_balancer_needs_kick(rq))
+		flags |= NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
 out:
 	if (READ_ONCE(nohz.needs_update))
 		flags |= NOHZ_NEXT_KICK;
@@ -12833,16 +12838,14 @@ static void set_cpu_sd_state_busy(int cpu)
 {
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	guard(rcu)();
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
 
 	if (!sd || !sd->nohz_idle)
-		goto unlock;
+		return;
 	sd->nohz_idle = 0;
 
 	atomic_inc(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 void nohz_balance_exit_idle(struct rq *rq)
@@ -12862,16 +12865,14 @@ static void set_cpu_sd_state_idle(int cpu)
 {
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	guard(rcu)();
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
 
 	if (!sd || sd->nohz_idle)
-		goto unlock;
+		return;
 	sd->nohz_idle = 1;
 
 	atomic_dec(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.54.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-28  5:16 [PATCH v4 0/6] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  5:16 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-28  8:33   ` [PATCH 1/6] sched/fair: Use guard(rcu) for sched_domain RCU sections K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28 10:43     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 11:04       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28 11:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-28 13:16         ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:12     ` Steven Rostedt
2026-04-28 14:26       ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-28 14:29         ` Steven Rostedt
2026-04-28  5:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Attach sched_domain_shared to sd_asym_cpucapacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  6:45   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-28  8:47     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  5:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  5:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched/fair: Reject misfit pulls onto busy SMT siblings on asym-capacity Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  5:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Add SIS_UTIL support to select_idle_capacity() Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  5:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched/topology: Remove SMT/asym capacity warning Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  5:28   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28  5:54     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-28  6:04       ` Andrea Righi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260428051720.3180182-2-arighi@nvidia.com \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fabecassis@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox