From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Lekë Hapçiu" <snowwlake@icloud.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, krzk@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 0/5] nfc: fix multiple OOB reads in NCI and LLCP parsing paths
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:55:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428125523.GQ900403@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424180151.3808557-1-snowwlake@icloud.com>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 08:01:46PM +0200, Lekë Hapçiu wrote:
> This series fixes five out-of-bounds / underflow bugs in the kernel NFC
> stack. All are reachable from a remote NFC peer that the local stack
> has already associated with; in the LLCP cases the peer only needs to
> send a malformed frame.
>
> 1/5 nci: u8 underflow in nci_store_general_bytes_nfc_dep() lets the
> attacker-controlled atr_res_len skip the GT-offset subtraction
> and cause an OOB read/write against general_bytes[].
> 2/5 llcp: parse_gb_tlv() / parse_connection_tlv() trust the TLV
> length byte without checking remaining buffer, and the tlv16
> accessors read past the end when length < 2.
> 3/5 llcp: nfc_llcp_recv_snl() has the same TLV-length trust bug, and
> its SDRES handler uses an unbounded "%.16s" pr_debug() that
> walks past service_name_len.
> 4/5 llcp: nfc_llcp_recv_dm() reads skb->data[3] without checking
> skb->len, giving a 1-byte heap OOB read.
> 5/5 llcp: nfc_llcp_connect_sn() walks the TLV array with no length
> validation; a crafted CONNECT frame drops it into OOB reads /
> an unbounded service-name pointer.
>
> The series applies on top of net/main.
>
> Lekë Hapçiu (5):
> nfc: nci: fix u8 underflow in nci_store_general_bytes_nfc_dep
> nfc: llcp: fix TLV parsing in parse_gb_tlv and parse_connection_tlv
> nfc: llcp: fix TLV parsing OOB in nfc_llcp_recv_snl
> nfc: llcp: fix OOB read of DM reason byte in nfc_llcp_recv_dm
> nfc: llcp: fix TLV parsing OOB in nfc_llcp_connect_sn
Hi,
My only feedback on v4 of this patchset is that somehow the
threading is broken: each of patch 1/5 - 5/5 should be a reply
to the cover letter - 0/5 - but that does not seem to be the case.
And some tooling, notably Sashiko, seems to rely on the
entire patchset being contained in a single email thread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 18:01 [PATCH net v4 0/5] nfc: fix multiple OOB reads in NCI and LLCP parsing paths Lekë Hapçiu
2026-04-24 18:13 ` [PATCH net v4 3/5] nfc: llcp: fix TLV parsing OOB in nfc_llcp_recv_snl Lekë Hapçiu
2026-04-24 18:13 ` [PATCH net v4 4/5] nfc: llcp: fix OOB read of DM reason byte in nfc_llcp_recv_dm Lekë Hapçiu
2026-04-24 18:13 ` [PATCH net v4 5/5] nfc: llcp: fix TLV parsing OOB in nfc_llcp_connect_sn Lekë Hapçiu
2026-04-28 12:55 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-04-28 13:46 ` [PATCH net v4 0/5] nfc: fix multiple OOB reads in NCI and LLCP parsing paths Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260428125523.GQ900403@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=snowwlake@icloud.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox