From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803FE39C007; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777504641; cv=none; b=vDO7NcfZo7j+q6cgnH/9BGSrFM0ui/arwO4Mmu+kGL90+kUPPDrRm2A8xY2AA3wX2fBzqXZGso/vTpG5bFL/siR1bmC7iUGI0NmKYEBEblfOjsx2dyGj6v/cbHJ19PaRwr6vuz/0TqsM6wfkyoRsaS+Rr4MF5amuueB3nJ69uE0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777504641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4jJeWdmZnzZi/LhT/fJ6ga8VlqvfMGdY7/U3kGiTDpg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iJrZl6auRr9LGiNt/mBDwlHAz8T4N4CtjU8o3hgXRfWvD1fSw7J817k8kzVf8Gbm1onfoR4wuAxRils7kZ/p5dGrOuv9ACzjlSSYeIK92QFFreNslnlLLZLuLFqGsXCBzAqAMWxaqIWcGEPIoUyonVrdGHFQoqsICX6hGV+/WrY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qm3Mv4H1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qm3Mv4H1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A1E2C19425; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 23:17:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777504641; bh=4jJeWdmZnzZi/LhT/fJ6ga8VlqvfMGdY7/U3kGiTDpg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qm3Mv4H1oMHsYITiEHgnVa+SGjTAk7aTX7qaK+NJOKkhRmoWjTBIWbc4VCJexini+ hT7QWxyrqQwVPI9qCNs2pR304tCzOg26RJiDQsmewOQBgNJhrSc4WmPiz4IDghGC4p C44ZA/aX2kJnmwRO+YNNK04wp9FIGrkCXLJ5Jy5Gy+sQZTnv+1vlqu778ZMI+D70UM S3TY47jysA+8aFgijrEDznIQ1BH6NK4a6JVaet2RS8cmzLAB5K7iFy3V0fbqkBrgwV lvEvaPN7SlBHvdyjmnzllOS5Ngwm7FpzvozH2+AWWb2TJXIW0ERS5pSLvCEUZUT+6p ydb8i/+R4XQeQ== Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:17:19 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+ca9d5686d06994c6547c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] WARNING: ODEBUG bug in lane_ioctl (3) Message-ID: <20260429161719.1ceca7f8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260429151741.660828-1-arjan@linux.intel.com> References: <69f16c26.170a0220.34e5b8.0013.GAE@google.com> <20260429151741.660828-1-arjan@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:17:41 -0700 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > This email is created by automation to help kernel developers deal with > a large volume of bug reports by decoding oopses into more actionable > information. Just one opinion but I don't think it is helping me. I'd assume at this point that maintainers can run the syzbot reports thru their own slop generators if they want to? And hopefully those local slop generators would notice obvious facts like that this is a report for code which no longer exists upstream :\