From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44AB22848BA for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 04:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777523857; cv=none; b=n3sZSIXThC6/10qhXovJTxV9WtuQe9KYpyKDRuNkfM+0LZCYULgZy6Yk+/fcNR5a2L+McuQDU/i6hR6lvScLQ6OW/homhASiukDB7J4Z8wH1zI38rvZRaNvvQyZrhwuSrrQhq1JJ2d/oiXTvqjBrSJ7eyHH7mV02VfciC003j3M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777523857; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7Ff6KXqii3nlF79VBg109uLkToNFhNehEDljOeDkC2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rYWZrhGeCDnCZFjONis/oKxqtyPzrYHsDt3yBBBhjC/hMaj9RjUAVSMqhL4H8KRk/Hvf8FpYT3Jpo6u28Px2B/UZF3TllnGhitcwVx6vBMG9yIqNSardTzhhp/Xamciyww6ZVnmvcRrmZG8l6Erf5TwXP19SD7ZfrOcpOUY6Qz8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=biHGaodW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="biHGaodW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777523855; x=1809059855; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=7Ff6KXqii3nlF79VBg109uLkToNFhNehEDljOeDkC2w=; b=biHGaodW9CMixb528r0CNpjstU0x0tQ+pigw/FkIm9v+HFEEhreAxvcS XzTgfx+/f4cESKOgGDBcIbtyxNqnOERGhLJSLwmWbrt7sagH7HatHyukz 7JBpPUkumz+hMRlYj0HtMZSl+sxrCYE0FI33yqjQ4wfd0GSHdbpr5JZsN E1a770KFiXbZSJmkYl4uduOyN7C4mUTYrdhUB9JQ/n4yUXNzXEAO2FKvW 3I9w3Td9jLwQw42oFbjk12Pd/QwiRJz5MTKKjushHQzW0qSjEibNpi/6G OtlhQJ9jQSwoTuhPeII3ZAuIvfS/NEQdQPMuhloEv+1HFDBiCC3YBaMnb Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nICJ9ab5RueAG1VVDdM/nQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ydgWcXysQUuBWUNLJBMcCw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11771"; a="78654392" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,207,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="78654392" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 21:37:35 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iBzBWf0RRDiRHa+HppVMGw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8bKNr/5kR+uP5Wse+UarBA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,207,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="236238135" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO bdf09bfdbd5f) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2026 21:37:32 -0700 Received: from kbuild by bdf09bfdbd5f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wIJ9V-000000004kD-3ad5; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 04:37:29 +0000 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 06:37:18 +0200 From: kernel test robot To: =?utf-8?B?7KCE66+87Iud?= , "kbusch@kernel.org" , "hch@lst.de" Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, "axboe@kernel.dk" , "sagi@grimberg.me" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , =?utf-8?B?7KCE66+87Iud?= , =?utf-8?B?7J207J2A7IiY?= , =?utf-8?B?7Lm47LCs?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error Message-ID: <202604300644.6qVuhQQC-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260416010713epcms2p78575bd400f93f6edb7fe3f3ead5bf930@epcms2p7> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260416010713epcms2p78575bd400f93f6edb7fe3f3ead5bf930@epcms2p7> Hi 전민식, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on axboe/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linux-nvme/for-next linus/master v7.1-rc1] [cannot apply to next-20260429] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/nvme-Skip-trace-complete_rq-on-host-path-error/20260416-180151 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416010713epcms2p78575bd400f93f6edb7fe3f3ead5bf930%40epcms2p7 patch subject: [PATCH v6] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260430/202604300644.6qVuhQQC-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260430/202604300644.6qVuhQQC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604300644.6qVuhQQC-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/nvme/host/core.c:457:6: warning: no previous prototype for function '__nvme_complete_rq' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 457 | void __nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req) | ^ drivers/nvme/host/core.c:457:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 457 | void __nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req) | ^ | static 1 warning generated. vim +/__nvme_complete_rq +457 drivers/nvme/host/core.c 456 > 457 void __nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req) 458 { 459 struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(req)->ctrl; 460 461 nvme_cleanup_cmd(req); 462 463 /* 464 * Completions of long-running commands should not be able to 465 * defer sending of periodic keep alives, since the controller 466 * may have completed processing such commands a long time ago 467 * (arbitrarily close to command submission time). 468 * req->deadline - req->timeout is the command submission time 469 * in jiffies. 470 */ 471 if (ctrl->kas && 472 req->deadline - req->timeout >= ctrl->ka_last_check_time) 473 ctrl->comp_seen = true; 474 475 switch (nvme_decide_disposition(req)) { 476 case COMPLETE: 477 nvme_end_req(req); 478 return; 479 case RETRY: 480 nvme_retry_req(req); 481 return; 482 case FAILOVER: 483 nvme_failover_req(req); 484 return; 485 case AUTHENTICATE: 486 #ifdef CONFIG_NVME_HOST_AUTH 487 queue_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->dhchap_auth_work); 488 nvme_retry_req(req); 489 #else 490 nvme_end_req(req); 491 #endif 492 return; 493 } 494 } 495 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki