From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] userfaultfd: merge fs/userfaultfd.c into mm/userfaultfd.c
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:01:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430090110.f3ed78910ea7cface7d73199@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430113512.115938-1-rppt@kernel.org>
On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:35:10 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> These patches merge fs/userfaultfd.c into mm/userfaultfd.c and make
> functions used only inside mm/userfaultfd.c static.
It's kinda scary how often Sashiko finds existing issues just because
we made it look.
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260430113512.115938-1-rppt@kernel.org
Do either of these look legit? If so, it would be better to fix them
before doing the code movement, for backporting ease.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 11:35 [PATCH 0/2] userfaultfd: merge fs/userfaultfd.c into mm/userfaultfd.c Mike Rapoport
2026-04-30 11:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Mike Rapoport
2026-04-30 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] userfaultfd: make functions that are not used outside uffd static Mike Rapoport
2026-04-30 11:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] userfaultfd: merge fs/userfaultfd.c into mm/userfaultfd.c David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-30 14:23 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-30 14:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-30 14:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-30 16:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430090110.f3ed78910ea7cface7d73199@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox