From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bitmap tree
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:11:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430091113.4086100-1-thierry.reding@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi all,
After merging the bitmap tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allnoconfig) failed like this:
ld: arch/x86/events/intel/core.o: in function `intel_hybrid_get_attr_cpus':
core.c:(.text+0x944): undefined reference to `cpumap_print_to_pagebuf'
ld: kernel/events/core.o: in function `cpumask_show':
core.c:(.text+0xcb8): undefined reference to `cpumap_print_to_pagebuf'
ld: drivers/base/cpu.o: in function `show_cpus_attr':
cpu.c:(.text+0x280): undefined reference to `cpumap_print_to_pagebuf'
Caused by commit
6d3a0b07f271 ("cpumask: switch cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() to using scnprintf()")
This seems to be caused by the new function not being available for
!CONFIG_SMP configurations, whereas previously it was a static inline
function and hence present irrespective of configuration.
I've fixed this up for today by reverting the following patches:
af327141d0dd ("bitmap: drop bitmap_print_to_pagebuf()")
6d3a0b07f271 ("cpumask: switch cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() to using scnprintf()")
Please fix this properly in the bitmap tree.
Thierry
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 9:11 Thierry Reding [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-24 15:11 linux-next: build failure after merge of the bitmap tree Mark Brown
2026-03-24 17:56 ` Yury Norov
2025-11-25 7:24 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-25 8:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-11-25 8:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-11-25 8:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-11-25 14:44 ` Yury Norov
2025-11-25 14:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-11-25 8:53 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-11-28 8:17 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-02-18 5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-18 10:35 ` Beata Michalska
2025-02-18 13:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-18 14:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-18 14:16 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-18 18:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-18 19:28 ` Beata Michalska
2025-02-18 19:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-08 6:27 Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-08 13:24 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-05-08 22:18 ` Yury Norov
2023-10-20 4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-19 6:01 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-19 15:58 ` Yury Norov
2023-10-20 4:24 ` Yury Norov
2023-10-20 4:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-20 12:33 ` Yury Norov
2023-11-02 11:41 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-09-26 23:53 broonie
2022-09-27 0:37 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-27 18:56 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-20 8:08 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-20 14:49 ` Yury Norov
2022-07-27 10:29 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-22 9:16 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-22 19:29 ` Yury Norov
2022-07-15 10:29 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-08 7:47 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-02 8:15 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-19 4:29 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430091113.4086100-1-thierry.reding@kernel.org \
--to=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox