From: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
To: Matt Evans <mattev@meta.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
alex@shazbot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio/pci: Replace vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap() with vfio_pci_core_get_iomap()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:13:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430141348.725be59c@shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430100340.2787446-3-mattev@meta.com>
On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:03:21 -0700
Matt Evans <mattev@meta.com> wrote:
> Since "vfio/pci: Set up barmap in vfio_pci_core_enable()", the
> resource request and iomap for the BARs was performed early, and
> vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap() just checks those actions succeeded.
>
> Move this logic to a new helper that checks success and returns the
> iomap address, replacing the various bare vdev->barmap[] lookups.
> This maintains the error behaviour of the previous on-demand
> vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap() scheme.>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Evans <mattev@meta.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c | 17 +++++++------
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 11 ++++-----
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c | 37 +++++++----------------------
> drivers/vfio/pci/virtio/legacy_io.c | 13 +++++-----
> include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 19 ++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c
> index fa056b69f899..2f5ec60c15d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c
> @@ -184,13 +184,11 @@ static int nvgrace_gpu_open_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
>
> /*
> * GPU readiness is checked by reading the BAR0 registers.
> - *
> - * ioremap BAR0 to ensure that the BAR0 mapping is present before
> - * register reads on first fault before establishing any GPU
> - * memory mapping.
> + * The BAR map was just set up by vfio_pci_core_enable() and,
> + * although the readiness check checks validity of the BAR0
> + * map, assert early that the map was successful:
> */
> - ret = vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(vdev, 0);
> - if (ret)
> + if (IS_ERR(vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(vdev, 0)))
> goto error_exit;
>
> if (nvdev->resmem.memlength) {
> @@ -265,6 +263,7 @@ static int
> nvgrace_gpu_check_device_ready(struct nvgrace_gpu_pci_core_device *nvdev)
> {
> struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = &nvdev->core_device;
> + void __iomem *io;
> int ret;
>
> lockdep_assert_held_read(&vdev->memory_lock);
> @@ -275,7 +274,11 @@ nvgrace_gpu_check_device_ready(struct nvgrace_gpu_pci_core_device *nvdev)
> if (!__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> return -EIO;
>
> - ret = nvgrace_gpu_wait_device_ready(vdev->barmap[0]);
> + io = vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(vdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(io))
> + return PTR_ERR(io);
> +
> + ret = nvgrace_gpu_wait_device_ready(io);
I suspect the preference would be to test:
if (IS_ERR(vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(vdev, 0)))
goto error_exit;
in nvgrace_gpu_open_device(), then just use:
ret = nvgrace_gpu_wait_device_ready(vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(vdev, 0);
here.
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index eab4f2626b39..feaf894ac118 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ int vfio_pci_core_mmap(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma
> struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> unsigned int index;
> u64 phys_len, req_len, pgoff, req_start;
> - int ret;
> + void __iomem *bar_io;
>
> index = vma->vm_pgoff >> (VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> @@ -1794,12 +1794,11 @@ int vfio_pci_core_mmap(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> - * Even though we don't make use of the barmap for the mmap,
> - * we need to request the region and the barmap tracks that.
> + * Ensure the BAR resource region is reserved for use.
> */
> - ret = vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(vdev, index);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + bar_io = vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(vdev, index);
> + if (IS_ERR(bar_io))
> + return PTR_ERR(bar_io);
>
> vma->vm_private_data = vdev;
> vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> index f66ad3d96481..7f14dd46de17 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> @@ -198,26 +198,6 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool test_mem,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw);
>
> -int vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int bar)
> -{
> - /*
> - * The barmap is set up in vfio_pci_core_enable(). Callers
> - * use this function to check that the BAR resources are
> - * requested or that the pci_iomap() was done.
> - */
> - if (bar < 0 || bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - /* Did vfio_pci_core_map_bars() set it up yet? */
> - if (!vdev->barmap[bar])
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - if (IS_ERR(vdev->barmap[bar]))
> - return PTR_ERR(vdev->barmap[bar]);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap);
> -
> ssize_t vfio_pci_bar_rw(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos, bool iswrite)
> {
> @@ -269,13 +249,11 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_bar_rw(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> */
> max_width = VFIO_PCI_IO_WIDTH_4;
> } else {
> - int ret = vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(vdev, bar);
> - if (ret) {
> - done = ret;
> + io = vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(vdev, bar);
> + if (IS_ERR(io)) {
> + done = PTR_ERR(io);
> goto out;
> }
> -
> - io = vdev->barmap[bar];
> }
>
> if (bar == vdev->msix_bar) {
> @@ -430,6 +408,7 @@ int vfio_pci_ioeventfd(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, loff_t offset,
> loff_t pos = offset & VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_MASK;
> int ret, bar = VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(offset);
> struct vfio_pci_ioeventfd *ioeventfd;
> + void __iomem *io;
>
> /* Only support ioeventfds into BARs */
> if (bar > VFIO_PCI_BAR5_REGION_INDEX)
> @@ -447,9 +426,9 @@ int vfio_pci_ioeventfd(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, loff_t offset,
> if (count == 8)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(vdev, bar);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + io = vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(vdev, bar);
> + if (IS_ERR(io))
> + return PTR_ERR(io);
>
> mutex_lock(&vdev->ioeventfds_lock);
>
> @@ -486,7 +465,7 @@ int vfio_pci_ioeventfd(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, loff_t offset,
> }
>
> ioeventfd->vdev = vdev;
> - ioeventfd->addr = vdev->barmap[bar] + pos;
> + ioeventfd->addr = io + pos;
> ioeventfd->data = data;
> ioeventfd->pos = pos;
> ioeventfd->bar = bar;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/virtio/legacy_io.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/virtio/legacy_io.c
> index 1ed349a55629..c868b2177310 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/virtio/legacy_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/virtio/legacy_io.c
> @@ -299,19 +299,18 @@ int virtiovf_pci_ioctl_get_region_info(struct vfio_device *core_vdev,
> static int virtiovf_set_notify_addr(struct virtiovf_pci_core_device *virtvdev)
> {
> struct vfio_pci_core_device *core_device = &virtvdev->core_device;
> - int ret;
> + void __iomem *io;
>
> /*
> * Setup the BAR where the 'notify' exists to be used by vfio as well
> * This will let us mmap it only once and use it when needed.
> */
> - ret = vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(core_device,
> - virtvdev->notify_bar);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + io = vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(core_device,
> + virtvdev->notify_bar);
> + if (IS_ERR(io))
> + return PTR_ERR(io);
>
> - virtvdev->notify_addr = core_device->barmap[virtvdev->notify_bar] +
> - virtvdev->notify_offset;
> + virtvdev->notify_addr = io + virtvdev->notify_offset;
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> index 2ebba746c18f..5598071c5ea3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ int vfio_pci_core_match_token_uuid(struct vfio_device *core_vdev,
> int vfio_pci_core_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev);
> void vfio_pci_core_disable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev);
> void vfio_pci_core_finish_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev);
> -int vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int bar);
> pci_ers_result_t vfio_pci_core_aer_err_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> pci_channel_state_t state);
> ssize_t vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool test_mem,
> @@ -234,6 +233,24 @@ static inline bool is_aligned_for_order(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> !IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1 << order)));
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns a BAR's iomap base, or an ERR_PTR() if, for example, the
> + * BAR isn't valid, its resource wasn't acquired, or its iomap
> + * failed.
> + */
> +static inline void __iomem __must_check *
> +vfio_pci_core_get_iomap(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int bar)
> +{
> + if (bar < 0 || bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + /* Did vfio_pci_core_map_bars() set it up yet? */
> + if (!vdev->barmap[bar])
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> + return vdev->barmap[bar];
> +}
> +
Regarding the previously exported symbol, if the concern is that it was
a GPL symbol and now it's a static inline, it's not doing anything that
couldn't easily be open coded, so I don't see an issue. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 10:03 [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio/pci: Request resources and map BARs at enable time Matt Evans
2026-04-30 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] vfio/pci: Set up bar resources and maps in vfio_pci_core_enable() Matt Evans
2026-04-30 20:13 ` Alex Williamson
2026-04-30 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio/pci: Replace vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap() with vfio_pci_core_get_iomap() Matt Evans
2026-04-30 20:13 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2026-04-30 10:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] vfio/pci: Check BAR resources before exporting a DMABUF Matt Evans
2026-04-30 20:13 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430141348.725be59c@shazbot.org \
--to=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattev@meta.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox