From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, david@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, surenb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
ljs@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, usama.arif@linux.dev,
Rik van Riel <riel@meta.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 20/45] mm: page_alloc: aggressively pack non-movable allocations in tainted SPBs on large systems
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:20:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430202233.111010-21-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430202233.111010-1-riel@surriel.com>
From: Rik van Riel <riel@meta.com>
On systems with many superpageblocks, sub-pageblock MOVABLE fragments
within already-tainted SPBs were being skipped by __rmqueue_claim()
due to the ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT pageblock_order floor. This caused the
allocator to fall through to clean SPBs, tainting them unnecessarily.
Introduce SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD: on systems with more than 8
superpageblocks, relax the min_order floor for the preferred category
(tainted SPBs) so non-movable allocations consume free space there at
any granularity. On small systems, preserve the pageblock_order floor
to protect MOVABLE capacity within tainted SPBs.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7 syzkaller
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 13bc57592cd5..215b7d6b95d2 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2643,6 +2643,24 @@ static void prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags
*/
#define SPB_TAINTED_RESERVE 4
+/*
+ * On systems with many superpageblocks, we can afford to "write off"
+ * tainted superpageblocks by aggressively packing unmovable/reclaimable
+ * allocations into them — even sub-pageblock fragments — to keep clean
+ * superpageblocks clean for future 1GB hugepage and contiguous allocations.
+ *
+ * On small systems (few superpageblocks), each SPB represents a large
+ * fraction of total memory. Aggressively claiming sub-pageblock movable
+ * fragments from tainted SPBs would destroy MOVABLE capacity that the
+ * system can't afford to lose, with little benefit since there are too
+ * few SPBs to meaningfully separate movable from unmovable anyway.
+ *
+ * This threshold controls the crossover: above it, prefer concentrating
+ * non-movable allocations in tainted SPBs at any granularity; below it,
+ * only claim whole free pageblocks from tainted SPBs.
+ */
+#define SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD 8
+
/**
* sb_preferred_for_movable - Find the fullest clean superpageblock for movable
* @zone: zone to search
@@ -3555,6 +3573,7 @@ __rmqueue_claim(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype,
{
int current_order;
int min_order = order;
+ int nofrag_min_order = order;
struct page *page;
int fallback_mt;
static const unsigned int cat_search[] = {
@@ -3568,9 +3587,18 @@ __rmqueue_claim(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype,
* Do not steal pages from freelists belonging to other pageblocks
* i.e. orders < pageblock_order. If there are no local zones free,
* the zonelists will be reiterated without ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT.
+ *
+ * Only apply this restriction to empty and clean superpageblocks.
+ * Claiming within already-tainted superpageblocks does not cause
+ * new fragmentation, and skipping them wastes free space that
+ * could prevent tainting clean superpageblocks.
+ *
+ * When ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT is set, skip empty and clean superpageblocks
+ * entirely to avoid tainting them. The slowpath will try reclaim and
+ * compaction first, and only drop ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT as a last resort.
*/
if (order < pageblock_order && alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT)
- min_order = pageblock_order;
+ nofrag_min_order = pageblock_order;
/*
* Find the largest available free page in a fallback migratetype.
@@ -3580,6 +3608,31 @@ __rmqueue_claim(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype,
* ones.
*/
for (c = 0; c < ARRAY_SIZE(cat_search); c++) {
+ /*
+ * When avoiding fragmentation, do not search clean/empty
+ * superpageblocks for fallback pages. Tainting a clean SPB
+ * is the worst outcome — better to fail and let the slowpath
+ * try reclaim and compaction in already-tainted SPBs first.
+ */
+ if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT) &&
+ cat_search[c] != SB_SEARCH_PREFERRED)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * For the preferred category (tainted SPBs for non-movable),
+ * search all orders down to the allocation order on systems
+ * with enough superpageblocks that we can afford to write off
+ * tainted ones. These SPBs are already tainted, so sub-pageblock
+ * stealing doesn't cause additional fragmentation.
+ *
+ * On small systems, keep the pageblock_order floor to preserve
+ * MOVABLE capacity within tainted SPBs — see comment at
+ * SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD.
+ */
+ min_order = (cat_search[c] == SB_SEARCH_PREFERRED &&
+ zone->nr_superpageblocks > SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD) ?
+ order : nofrag_min_order;
+
for (current_order = MAX_PAGE_ORDER;
current_order >= min_order; --current_order) {
if (!should_try_claim_block(current_order,
@@ -3850,8 +3903,18 @@ static bool rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
* For movable allocations, prefer pageblocks from the
* fullest clean superpageblock to pack allocations and
* preserve empty superpageblocks for 1GB hugepages.
+ *
+ * For non-movable allocations, force ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT so
+ * __rmqueue cannot steal a whole pageblock out of a clean
+ * SPB. Stealing is the worst possible outcome for a bulk
+ * refill: a single network or slab burst can taint dozens
+ * of clean pageblocks. Phase 2 will adopt sub-pageblock
+ * fragments from tainted SPBs before Phase 3 falls back to
+ * the original alloc_flags (which may eventually steal at
+ * the requested order, a much smaller fragmentation event).
*/
while (refilled + pageblock_nr_pages <= pages_needed) {
+ unsigned int p1_alloc_flags = alloc_flags;
struct page *page = NULL;
if (migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) {
@@ -3861,11 +3924,14 @@ static bool rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
if (sb)
page = __rmqueue_from_sb(zone, pageblock_order,
migratetype, sb);
+ } else if (!is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) {
+ p1_alloc_flags = (p1_alloc_flags | ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT) &
+ ~ALLOC_NOFRAG_TAINTED_OK;
}
if (!page)
page = __rmqueue(zone, pageblock_order,
migratetype,
- alloc_flags, &rmqm);
+ p1_alloc_flags, &rmqm);
if (!page)
break;
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 20:20 [00/45 RFC PATCH] 1GB superpageblock memory allocation Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 01/45] mm: page_alloc: replace pageblock_flags bitmap with struct pageblock_data Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 02/45] mm: page_alloc: per-cpu pageblock buddy allocator Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 03/45] mm: page_alloc: use trylock for PCP lock in free path to avoid lock inversion Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 04/45] mm: mm_init: fix zone assignment for pages in unavailable ranges Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 05/45] mm: vmstat: restore per-migratetype free counts in /proc/pagetypeinfo Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 06/45] mm: page_alloc: remove watermark boost mechanism Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 07/45] mm: page_alloc: async evacuation of stolen movable pageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 08/45] mm: page_alloc: track actual page contents in pageblock flags Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 09/45] mm: page_alloc: introduce superpageblock metadata for 1GB anti-fragmentation Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 10/45] mm: page_alloc: support superpageblock resize for memory hotplug Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/45] mm: page_alloc: add superpageblock fullness lists for allocation steering Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 12/45] mm: page_alloc: steer pageblock stealing to tainted superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 13/45] mm: page_alloc: steer movable allocations to fullest clean superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 14/45] mm: page_alloc: extract claim_whole_block from try_to_claim_block Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 15/45] mm: page_alloc: add per-superpageblock free lists Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 16/45] mm: page_alloc: add background superpageblock defragmentation worker Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 17/45] mm: page_alloc: add within-superpageblock compaction for clean superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 18/45] mm: page_alloc: superpageblock-aware contiguous and higher order allocation Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 19/45] mm: page_alloc: prevent atomic allocations from tainting clean SPBs Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 21/45] mm: page_alloc: prefer reclaim over tainting clean superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 22/45] mm: page_alloc: adopt partial pageblocks from tainted superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 23/45] mm: page_alloc: add CONFIG_DEBUG_VM sanity checks for SPB counters Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 24/45] mm: page_alloc: targeted evacuation and dynamic reserves for tainted SPBs Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 25/45] mm: page_alloc: skip pageblock compatibility threshold in " Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 26/45] mm: page_alloc: prevent UNMOVABLE/RECLAIMABLE mixing in pageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 27/45] mm: trigger deferred SPB evacuation when atomic allocs would taint a clean SPB Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 28/45] mm: page_alloc: keep PCP refill in tainted SPBs across owned pageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 29/45] mm: page_alloc: refuse fragmenting fallback for callers with cheap fallback Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [RFC PATCH 30/45] mm: page_alloc: drive slab shrink from SPB anti-fragmentation pressure Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 31/45] mm: page_alloc: cross-non-movable buddy borrow within tainted SPBs Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 32/45] mm: page_alloc: proactive high-water trigger for SPB slab shrink Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 33/45] mm: page_alloc: refuse to taint clean SPBs for atomic NORETRY callers Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 34/45] mm: page_reporting: walk per-superpageblock free lists Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 35/45] mm: show_mem: collect migratetype letters from per-superpageblock lists Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 36/45] mm: page_alloc: add alloc_flags parameter to __rmqueue_smallest Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 37/45] mm/slub: kvmalloc — add __GFP_NORETRY to large-kmalloc attempt Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 38/45] mm: page_alloc: per-(zone, order, mt) PASS_1 hint cache Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 39/45] mm: debug: prevent infinite recursion in dump_page() with CMA Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 40/45] PM: hibernate: walk per-superpageblock free lists in mark_free_pages Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 41/45] btrfs: allocate eb-attached btree pages as movable Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 42/45] mm: page_alloc: cross-MOV borrow within tainted SPBs Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 43/45] mm: page_alloc: trigger defrag from allocator hot path on tainted-SPB pressure Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 44/45] mm: page_alloc: SPB tracepoint instrumentation [DROP-FOR-UPSTREAM] Rik van Riel
2026-04-30 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 45/45] mm: page_alloc: enlarge and unify spb_evacuate_for_order Rik van Riel
2026-05-01 7:14 ` [00/45 RFC PATCH] 1GB superpageblock memory allocation David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-01 11:58 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430202233.111010-21-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@meta.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox