From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, Zhen Ni <zhen.ni@easystack.cn>,
vbabka@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/page_owner: add filter infrastructure for print_mode and NUMA filtering
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:12:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501001254.77598-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430112245.be3189f09bd6a71970a74746@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:22:45 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 May 2026 00:32:44 +0800 Zhen Ni <zhen.ni@easystack.cn> wrote:
>
> > This patch series introduces filtering capabilities to the page_owner
> > feature to address storage and performance challenges in production
> > environments.
>
> AI review asks a couple of reasonable-sounding questions:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260430163247.13628-1-zhen.ni@easystack.cn
I like the idea of this series and therefore willing to help reviewing. I
therefore added a few comments to the previous version of this series. But
unfortunately not that much to open the web browser for revewing the Sashiko
review on my own. I might willing to do that on my onw, if I could read that
on this email list. But that's not the case and I'm a lazy and bad reviewer...
Even if Zhen replies with his opinion saying Sashiko's review found no real
issue, if it doesn't have reasonable amount of explanation with original
Sashiko review quotes, I might still feel like I may better to double check
Zhen's opinion, but again I might not feel like to open web browser to read
origianl Sashiko review.
So I will hold reviewing this series until I sure the Sashiko reviews found no
blocker, or I forget the fact that there were concerning Sashiko reviews to
this series. Just wanted to make clear why I don't keep reviewing this series,
FWIW.
Thanks,
SJ
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 16:32 [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/page_owner: add filter infrastructure for print_mode and NUMA filtering Zhen Ni
2026-04-30 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/page_owner: add print_mode filter Zhen Ni
2026-04-30 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/page_owner: add NUMA node filter with nodelist support Zhen Ni
2026-04-30 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/page_owner: document page_owner filter features Zhen Ni
2026-04-30 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/page_owner: add filter infrastructure for print_mode and NUMA filtering Andrew Morton
2026-05-01 0:12 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260501001254.77598-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=zhen.ni@easystack.cn \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox