From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B26A23EAAD; Fri, 1 May 2026 01:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777600569; cv=none; b=PN1vzj/1JjW+cPayweTpJQr5jTqj8c8T0FOFijaJsXvTANh+nf//O4+GgPb8NO3IlZ5C6UzwoldSGdG2BZjhv6YGGnxVDYU7EL5EM4AAZoc7fwJqYYyq2RPEDZXf2SAIo5oB1/2VhzpBkYKZf0ll0bnN9o4aHkeL0t/jKJTi5XA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777600569; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qzviNm8rnhp1c0NC3tvj7ydyyrxohLehCvxK6danluE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=MQm2L3gDEoWcZtbY1YLvwzyay93KHlwa8L7wVB26XpgySdvBvTzeI4T828Nxcrenm1PRPY/ZMT67w+IJ2hy/3uAu2UJLNNAIm/2FwJCj1P8RYJqv6huL3rT8hG21MHMTNfuYWgp+PQYny3dC0JVvIdwunTnwdaapsnKgOHHHjRM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SFjIjmRL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SFjIjmRL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21DEBC2BCB3; Fri, 1 May 2026 01:56:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777600568; bh=qzviNm8rnhp1c0NC3tvj7ydyyrxohLehCvxK6danluE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SFjIjmRLHJwtVZaHIAzcwOOFWelAi76TY8UEznldmWeAh+LSB2QMEyWImvw1GhK49 jUnJjSMDGpR8zaZkSNB/YMvABpAj6pJRjUt4uR5T0QdyYaWsBHKSFXpwjDF+OWJdcq NdEGrMZU9DS0eC7wsE8RwU2R9VLoqqM46MYuMLwrpkt69iKQR0CAXZHBZRirUVery0 P+bjyt07fat5KFz1lQlbYSMzvJg4o8tQgq8U4AQUgDBofrvv3qtykX9LwH1Dt03opA ndFFQSZvm/9qJTnIdPXQ9+gSLKByzr5tMFxSE5+hjJ0IRLEWT7mixx2gB1ldj0grK6 MhnTEY9TNtcJw== From: SeongJae Park To: SeongJae Park Cc: Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Brendan Higgins , David Gow , David Hildenbrand , Jonathan Corbet , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Suren Baghdasaryan , Vlastimil Babka , damon@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] mm/damon: introduce DAMOS failed region quota charge ratio Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:56:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20260501015604.83041-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260428152424.125760-1-sj@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:24:24 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:48:37 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:49 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote: > > > > > TL; DR: Let users set different DAMOS quota charge ratios for DAMOS > > > action failed regions, for deterministic and consistent DAMOS action > > > progress. > > > > Add, thanks. > > > > As mentioned provately, Sashiko claims to have found things which it > > didn't see in the RFC. > > > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260428013402.115171-1-sj@kernel.org > > TL; DR: I find no blocker for this patch series from the Sashiko reviews. > > Now sashiko replies its reviews for DAMON patches to authors and > damon@lists.linux.dev. So I replied [1,2,3] my review of the reviews to those > on damon@lists.linux.dev mailing list. As I mentioned on the TL;DR, I find no > blocker for this series. > > And I think you didn't see those because those are sent to only authors and > damon@lists.linux.dev. > > I nowadays reply-all to original recipients only if Sashiko found a blocker. I > will also add short notice for non-RFC patches if Sashiko found zero issue. ... Now I think the short notice is only redundant and silly, as the full review is available on damon@ list and the one who primarily interested in (Andrew) understands that. I feel like the short-notice reply-all only increase unnecessary traffic and my redundant typing. I will not do the short notice broadcasting, unless someone makes a diffeernt voice. Thanks, SJ [...]