From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched/fair: Fix overflow in vruntime_eligible()
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 12:48:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501104805.GM3102924@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260501104006.GA3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 12:40:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Anyway, I had a poke around with godbolt, and the below seems to
> generate the best code for things like x86_64 and arm64.
https://godbolt.org/z/T389jd7bn
> Specifically, the __builtin_mul_overflow() already has to compute the
> 128 bit product anyway for most architectures, so using that directly
> then leads to saner asm and easier to understand code.
>
> AFAICT HPPA64 is the only 64bit architecture that doesn't implement
> __int128 and will thus be demoted to doing what we do on 32bit.
>
> Now all I need to do is write a coherent Changelog to go with it ...
> *sigh*
>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 728965851842..214fe9d99834 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static int vruntime_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime)
> load += weight;
> }
>
> - return avg >= vruntime_op(vruntime, "-", cfs_rq->zero_vruntime) * load;
> + return avg >= (sched_double_long_t)vruntime_op(vruntime, "-", cfs_rq->zero_vruntime) * load;
> }
>
> int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 9f63b15d309d..f15f4468efe5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ extern struct list_head asym_cap_list;
> * Really only required when CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y is also set, but to
> * increase coverage and consistency always enable it on 64-bit platforms.
> */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__)
> # define NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT (SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT + SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
> # define scale_load(w) ((w) << SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
> # define scale_load_down(w) \
> @@ -157,10 +157,12 @@ extern struct list_head asym_cap_list;
> __w = max(2UL, __w >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT); \
> __w; \
> })
> +typedef __int128 sched_double_long_t;
> #else
> # define NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT (SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
> # define scale_load(w) (w)
> # define scale_load_down(w) (w)
> +typedef s64 sched_double_long_t;
> #endif
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 14:57 [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix overflow in vruntime_eligible() Zhan Xusheng
2026-04-28 14:49 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Zhan Xusheng
2026-04-28 16:17 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-28 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-29 5:03 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-29 7:31 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-05-01 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-01 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-01 13:05 ` David Laight
2026-05-01 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-04 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-04 13:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-05-04 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-04 17:40 ` Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
2026-05-05 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-05 10:50 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Zhan Xusheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260501104805.GM3102924@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox