From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
sdf.kernel@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] vsock: convert to getsockopt_iter
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 22:21:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501222105.747dea59@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afTjvM1P4gjPSvW8@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com>
On Fri, 1 May 2026 10:32:44 -0700
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 08:52:52AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Convert AF_VSOCK's getsockopt implementation to use the new
> > getsockopt_iter callback with sockopt_t. The single
> > vsock_connectible_getsockopt() callback is shared by both
> > vsock_stream_ops and vsock_seqpacket_ops, so both proto_ops are
> > updated to use .getsockopt_iter.
> >
> > Key changes:
> > - Replace (char __user *optval, int __user *optlen) with sockopt_t *opt
> > - Use opt->optlen for buffer length (input) and returned size (output)
> > - Use copy_to_iter() instead of put_user()/copy_to_user()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > ---
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 16 +++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > index 44037b066a5ff..d4a97eeb596e6 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@
> > #include <linux/random.h>
> > #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> > #include <linux/smp.h>
> > +#include <linux/uio.h>
> > #include <linux/socket.h>
> > #include <linux/stddef.h>
> > #include <linux/sysctl.h>
> > @@ -2091,8 +2092,7 @@ static int vsock_connectible_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> >
> > static int vsock_connectible_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> > int level, int optname,
> > - char __user *optval,
> > - int __user *optlen)
> > + sockopt_t *opt)
> > {
> > struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> > struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> > @@ -2110,8 +2110,7 @@ static int vsock_connectible_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> > if (level != AF_VSOCK)
> > return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> >
> > - if (get_user(len, optlen))
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > + len = opt->optlen;
> >
> > memset(&v, 0, sizeof(v));
> >
> > @@ -2142,11 +2141,10 @@ static int vsock_connectible_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > if (len > lv)
> > len = lv;
> > - if (copy_to_user(optval, &v, len))
> > + if (copy_to_iter(&v, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
I'd wrap that as copy_to_sockopt(&v, len, opt).
or to make the edits easier: copy_to_sockopt(opt, &v, len).
Then if someone decides to change the implementation none of the call
sites need changing.
-- David
> > return -EFAULT;
> >
> > - if (put_user(len, optlen))
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > + opt->optlen = len;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -2631,7 +2629,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
> > .listen = vsock_listen,
> > .shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
> > .setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
> > - .getsockopt = vsock_connectible_getsockopt,
> > + .getsockopt_iter = vsock_connectible_getsockopt,
> > .sendmsg = vsock_connectible_sendmsg,
> > .recvmsg = vsock_connectible_recvmsg,
> > .mmap = sock_no_mmap,
> > @@ -2653,7 +2651,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
> > .listen = vsock_listen,
> > .shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
> > .setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
> > - .getsockopt = vsock_connectible_getsockopt,
> > + .getsockopt_iter = vsock_connectible_getsockopt,
> > .sendmsg = vsock_connectible_sendmsg,
> > .recvmsg = vsock_connectible_recvmsg,
> > .mmap = sock_no_mmap,
> >
> > --
> > 2.52.0
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 15:52 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: Convert AF_NETLINK and AF_VSOCK to getsockopt_iter API Breno Leitao
2026-05-01 15:52 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] netlink: convert to getsockopt_iter Breno Leitao
2026-05-04 14:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-01 15:52 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] vsock: " Breno Leitao
2026-05-01 17:32 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-05-01 21:21 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-05-04 14:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-01 15:52 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: selftests: add getsockopt_iter regression tests Breno Leitao
2026-05-01 17:17 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-05-04 14:57 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-05 2:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: Convert AF_NETLINK and AF_VSOCK to getsockopt_iter API patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260501222105.747dea59@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox