From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03F0D1DFF0; Sat, 2 May 2026 01:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777686976; cv=none; b=eKQ7p60MjOCUn7ClwIAqWPIlD3YDV/xdI+iwpIAplpF+Vkc3oFarCya8BnaO5bhbWo2kREc35LLBVBIszSSz0033ffNOvDWq7nNA1JLX+j+7YkhcjVfq1BjEx1vwwRrxGcH10Qg74jH6FXIXvTNsNrYiunbaj5i23gj6MiXbzYY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777686976; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jdf1fy/AOE9duotFUlzo2FacHlWMe7E9VEFUMMiyWis=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=sb1PEpdOLMD5ZpKw2Pc+30E8Z92yxEDhizWop9nEAIuYJAwVRCkwpFFjEOV4CY6UifFHpNCUXVjlfKJ74lfFFeyM7yFcZtmD5glvz69c2Rpj+k6cKUK1//BlW7hsDa8/9j52Ms9cVB+si5ojdSn3XnCueOeBH1os317sBl2C9HA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=r9n8A8qg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="r9n8A8qg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFF6FC2BCB4; Sat, 2 May 2026 01:56:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777686975; bh=jdf1fy/AOE9duotFUlzo2FacHlWMe7E9VEFUMMiyWis=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r9n8A8qgFspnzGkNmcw8lKNXv9qFv5CkWJe2p5OEfWitUudHlXaTgBS/Xwe+7OChP 1MHbCxT2B+Dak8KTL3Nn+FcZn5FFtrMeEoD1DzS4xo10MEwq/Z2aND4jSzQucs8F/r wNVpn03FrlSss+qcterKGSXHxlkukI3iANmFn/KgwDMojxTh2NyNTwII0/rlis6R5u NznN6tBIi7qsiQpK4Go/nLFdvhzxsOMuStKfcIlSr5ctmoBfvJ+G+2w+6IhxLQXPeC ng+jxYwyxbAH2nKZIGZXTH7u/Vn893hcKvoBaRKWF0FQwRqqqRlBGYudG7P0AigTAP 2AF+qQaDDLhYg== From: SeongJae Park To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: SeongJae Park , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Brendan Higgins , David Gow , Jonathan Corbet , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Suren Baghdasaryan , Vlastimil Babka , damon@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] mm/damon: introduce DAMOS failed region quota charge ratio Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 18:56:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20260502015607.79341-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <761b47b6-c2f1-4fef-bfab-48ee1d0bbe47@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 1 May 2026 08:49:43 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" wrote: [...] > For Damon Andrew should for now just trust your ACKs. If it has your ACK, it's > good to go. > > In the future, I expect you would pick up the patches yourself, which is where > you as the component maintainer would look for any blockers. FWIW I'm picking DAMON patches to damon/next tree on my own, for my testing and for a case that Andrew might miss those. > > So for Damon patches I don't think we need the AI review notices from Andrew. All make sense to me :) Thanks, SJ [...]