From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C21653630A8;
	Mon,  4 May 2026 23:49:05 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1777938545; cv=none; b=j5aTPfkGYuqYmWTaDi/3mPtjL/F4+E2NrR3o5mWnrapXsrBPhHN2i/czvUsFThSJzrlvmQeVY8slKUz8xqSQpwtjJAjqsUZZBCkW0T4A7blbMh72CWWcKWv9Or1xF9Y2EfFXV60RT1iQ0ytCODd6N5H1fQxmdykwQrookhDjYOY=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1777938545; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=1YEgTXFnNhsezPKG1SL44lFyIWkcrIRXOaIiyF2/U/I=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k6CNCowatv9NZmMOVYiBmczlRWbXoBR1YV6M+BXceFkLjneoqqSQ18Y+x5qHUjTkupBkDprq/tJFnh7cjtpZQj33B6GXH0pfYutgFS9kho//n+bn05D5Hb0n438EgcVBOIcNfDG32yZtVcoUEcyf+Xz4A1a4sacSD6HuZrxYTds=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=olEPb3Bk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="olEPb3Bk"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2479C2BCB9;
	Mon,  4 May 2026 23:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1777938545;
	bh=1YEgTXFnNhsezPKG1SL44lFyIWkcrIRXOaIiyF2/U/I=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=olEPb3BkVZSMdwvb8IksdtZmYho7UQAw/qi3eGEGkFvEXIcFdKAb5a9heqA2UxJXQ
	 Pgtx3l6JBOZZs+U2A7Eq6gUFuCrvnWoOlrcfTZKgC4mANd0kINogsaJBjgMfBDyQkx
	 KcwM1yqw41GiCipWVyHOrsbnxMDxz/4FXOpyh69dt3nH/hxUjADAp/3jgmNO8pmnvF
	 /1ntDLWbav4ikzuuQpSpzFotHxIIHiU9pwAN9u7ONp4SZbfLm0V1QRh1EaUhqZgj9a
	 vMa/3wLzdMDxZv3ifTkmxxfxylh9VemKeQScdxkTdzHN2xmbucBZwL1RgdPko6lE2F
	 seY27d5owCHBg==
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 16:49:01 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jon Kohler <jon@nutanix.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, Przemek Kitszel
 <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
 netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] e1000e: ethtool: add get_channels support
Message-ID: <20260504164901.7b3a737b@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20260504154823.2535612-1-jon@nutanix.com>
References: <20260504154823.2535612-1-jon@nutanix.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon,  4 May 2026 08:48:23 -0700 Jon Kohler wrote:
> e1000e hardware supports a single RX/TX queue pair, add basic support
> for ethtool -l (i.e. get_channels), so that callers indeed see a single
> queue.

Why? Isn't EOPNOTSUP from ethtool -l implicitly saying that there's
only one queue?