From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F107D34DCE3 for ; Mon, 4 May 2026 14:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777906754; cv=none; b=tQGmcjuOXrS49t0hniJVeVB0WKzfKcvEmoWFrhYMTLPzJg5Em1BszBG+yAn9zdU5INIaIJV1TVEROVkeiF43AFHZxBM1IJvUESBC/c52BuaewhsTZ8ecTExpuO+FlrSXdI7ShGesUkxIvE7gUc8ZpNxJlW8EDW5q2iWENmCAYsM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777906754; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d2t2jUtqgd1juOxoeK062E91VF8LFE0vF9cv6rz30/k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CiF4pO2qJidD74s3hq4iJg3ShLCpchD73qmv3Zh25xEDvdY0+3liu3Nu6SfayUEUW3OBf1ER0Aw2vsgvZFl/BnnTPt/pkg4s6KA3SF/ReOd1YX9B7RJE5OhUhElemsy1HMXcvV1J74fQIWiG+uqjT49j17f5r6MID3/JWGAWV4k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b=C2hhjtcc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=akknzvZ7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b="C2hhjtcc"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="akknzvZ7" Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCA77A00E9; Mon, 4 May 2026 10:59:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 May 2026 10:59:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1777906750; x=1777993150; bh=VM0D9cC+fH pBpvLJkUiCitWjau5Cr5ieWJVlaANWEPI=; b=C2hhjtccFJM5xGMn9iThmYQeDY YT9udf7N4q54ODF/m+iY1nmSFB/N2CQTWTJri1wwQVoXxJbPNLflYflbtb21Bo6H gZospj/2iqq5Vmky5nHQvAaPRf4oHZxGl7wv3Ss9MT6Yhyl9oaUps+cVs/Vw49YX W23t+xDJoHc9FPptRyRq6YKSdm34lCQ4EqHJA496Uy751m7veknuN3SYztjFZVxE 4FcFf/wxUvs6XHgY2ig5fhcCzVFLZCh9gZwNErZhPa0UdvgPsccv9rjSkuZKtY+w MNvzynHsEcCVbRWhITGL9xVySZkxZDWh1jxCqfm13ew4OYqwe7NYRH4CMNVw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1777906750; x=1777993150; bh=VM0D9cC+fHpBpvLJkUiCitWjau5Cr5ieWJV laANWEPI=; b=akknzvZ7QAADAV62kDxiUh+BXXR994d6OE+G2mFou2d5aSqiMpH uHIX9lzzMZVrkLaqMt49VI3n21HMKa4mXHYZRnaHuED5MvcDbuiz/3Q6T0TSxA7C wyB/D7K4nllkG003mr4KEfBl6BaVBi8cho+jTHLKm7tD25JTuG30w6a6ICe3bqZA cl8a/I0/8Bnl7Qrc18lRn/PHyY3v9wjucUgT5EZsdYtgBrEpkmVVdDZA8UAXjgc5 MKS3NAW3oQk7mnbnphpmyvQGsmncxiSLZL09I8io6oLtUND0sNDbWkWYQOtcCAmJ CAHGeAYYh8c8Pyss2A3Cl9HWbr3XKb6BB7w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdelledugecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcumffj uceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehgedvvedvle ejuefgtdduudfhkeeltdeihfevjeekjeeuhfdtueefhffgheekteenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtg homhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepkedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohep uggvnhhishgrrhiiuhgsohhvkeesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopeguvghnih hsrghriihusghovhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdhsthgr ghhinhhgsehlihhsthhsrdhlihhnuhigrdguvghvpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqkh gvrhhnvghlsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i787e41f1:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 4 May 2026 10:59:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 16:54:49 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Denis Arzubov Cc: denisarzubov@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove extra blank line in rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave() Message-ID: <2026050434-storm-hazily-7d9f@gregkh> References: <20260503215840.51342-1-denisarzubov8@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260503215840.51342-1-denisarzubov8@gmail.com> On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 12:58:40AM +0300, Denis Arzubov wrote: > Remove unnecessary blank line after variable declaration in > rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave() function to improve code readability > and comply with kernel coding style. > > Signed-off-by: Denis Arzubov > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c > index 0191a943f..27dfd00b4 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c > @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ void rtw_btcoex_LPS_Leave(struct adapter *padapter) > { > struct pwrctrl_priv *pwrpriv; > > - > pwrpriv = adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter); > > if (pwrpriv->pwr_mode != PS_MODE_ACTIVE) { > -- > 2.43.0 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch did not apply to any known trees that Greg is in control of. Possibly this is because you made it against Linus's tree, not the linux-next tree, which is where all of the development for the next version of the kernel is at. Please refresh your patch against the linux-next tree, or even better yet, the development tree specified in the MAINTAINERS file for the subsystem you are submitting a patch for, and resend it. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot