Re: [PATCH] rtc: ds1307: handle oscillator stop flag for ds1337/ds1339/ds3231

[Meagan Lloyd <meaganlloyd@linux.microsoft.com>]

Hi Ronan,

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 11:54:32PM +0000, Ronan Dalton wrote:
> Hi Meagan,
> 
> On Mon, 2026-05-04 at 15:08 -0700, Meagan Lloyd wrote:
> > > +       case ds_1337:
> > > +       case ds_1339:
> > > +       case ds_1341:
> > > +       case ds_3231:
> > > +               ret = regmap_read(ds1307->regmap,
> > > DS1337_REG_STATUS, &tmp);
> > > +               if (ret)
> > > +                       return ret;
> > > +               if (tmp & DS1337_BIT_OSF)
> > > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > > +               break;
> > 
> > If you're going to re-arrange the block to be in somewhat of an
> > order,
> > perhaps put it above 1338 since 1337 < 1338.
> 
> I've ordered it this way based on the first case statement in each
> block. Since ds_1337 > ds_1308, I've put the block below the block
> starting with ds_1308. I could instead order it based on the last case
> statement in each block, if you think that's better.

I agree with your ordering strategy, but your patch inserts it after the
ds_1338 case statement block (rather than the intended ds_1308).