From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/isolation: Don't free memblock allocated cpumasks
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 01:18:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505051821.1107133-1-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
When testing a v7.1 kernel with commit 59bd1d914bb5 ("memblock: warn when
freeing reserved memory before memory map is initialized"), the following
warning was hit when there was a "nohz_full" kernel boot parameter.
[ 0.080911] Cannot free reserved memory because of deferred initialization of the memory map
[ 0.080911] WARNING: mm/memblock.c:904 at __free_reserved_area+0xde/0xf0, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
:
[ 0.080945] Call Trace:
[ 0.080947] <TASK>
[ 0.080949] memblock_phys_free+0xcb/0x100
[ 0.080953] housekeeping_init+0x14c/0x170
[ 0.080957] start_kernel+0x207/0x450
[ 0.080961] x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
[ 0.080965] x86_64_start_kernel+0xda/0xe0
[ 0.080967] common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
[ 0.080972] </TASK>
The commit states that freeing of reserved memory before the memory
map is fully initialized in deferred_init_memmap() would cause access
to uninitialized struct pages and may crash when accessing spurious
list pointers. However, if the memblock_free() call is deferred to
the start of initcall processing in the bootup process, for instance,
the following KASAN warning can appear.
[ 8.514775] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in memblock_isolate_range+0x4ac/0x650
[ 8.514775] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88a07fe6a000 by task swapper/0/1
:
[ 8.514775] Call Trace:
[ 8.514775] <TASK>
[ 8.514775] kasan_report+0xb2/0x1b0
[ 8.514775] memblock_isolate_range+0x4ac/0x650
[ 8.514775] memblock_phys_free+0xc4/0x190
[ 8.514775] housekeeping_late_init+0x257/0x280
[ 8.514775] do_one_initcall+0xaa/0x470
[ 8.514775] do_initcalls+0x1b4/0x1f0
[ 8.514775] kernel_init_freeable+0x4b5/0x550
[ 8.514775] kernel_init+0x1c/0x150
[ 8.514775] ret_from_fork+0x5dc/0x8e0
[ 8.514775] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 8.514775] </TASK>
It is likely that memblock_discard() may discard memblock data needed
for memblock_free(). One workaround for now to avoid these warning/bug
messages is to keep the memblock allocated cpumasks even if they are
no longer needed until the memblock subsystem is properly updated to
handle memblock_free().
On most systems, memory occuipied by a cpumask is pretty small. So not
much memory will be wasted if the memblock cpumasks are not freed.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/sched/isolation.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index ef152d401fe2..ad9b1a1104e3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -189,7 +189,13 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(omask));
cpumask_copy(nmask, omask);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], nmask);
- memblock_free(omask, cpumask_size());
+
+ /*
+ * TODO: Don't free memblock allocated cpumasks until the
+ * memblock subystem is able to handle the memblock_free()
+ * properly.
+ */
+ // memblock_free(omask, cpumask_size());
}
}
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 5:18 Waiman Long [this message]
2026-05-06 13:25 ` [PATCH] sched/isolation: Don't free memblock allocated cpumasks Valentin Schneider
2026-05-06 14:02 ` Waiman Long
2026-05-08 14:19 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-10 14:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-05-10 15:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-05-11 4:55 ` Waiman Long
2026-05-11 8:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-05-11 21:36 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505051821.1107133-1-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox