From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
hughd@google.com, chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org,
axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com,
nphamcs@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com, youngjun.park@lge.com,
pfalcato@suse.de, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] mm/rmap: refactor hugetlb pte clearing in try_to_unmap_one
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 15:14:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506094504.2588857-3-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506094504.2588857-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
Simplify the code by refactoring the folio_test_hugetlb() branch into
a new function.
While at it, convert BUG helpers to WARN helpers.
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
---
mm/rmap.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index a5f067a09de0f..a98acdea0530a 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1978,6 +1978,68 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_unmap_pte_batch(struct folio *folio,
FPB_RESPECT_WRITE | FPB_RESPECT_SOFT_DIRTY);
}
+/* Returns false if unmap needs to be aborted */
+static inline bool unmap_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ struct folio *folio, struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
+ struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags, pte_t *pteval,
+ struct mmu_notifier_range *range, bool *exit_walk)
+{
+ /*
+ * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb page
+ * in the case where the hugetlb page is poisoned.
+ */
+ VM_WARN_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(page), page);
+ /*
+ * huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page.
+ * There is no way of knowing exactly which PMDs may
+ * be cached for this mm, so we must flush them all.
+ * start/end were already adjusted above to cover this
+ * range.
+ */
+ flush_cache_range(vma, range->start, range->end);
+
+ /*
+ * To call huge_pmd_unshare, i_mmap_rwsem must be
+ * held in write mode. Caller needs to explicitly
+ * do this outside rmap routines.
+ *
+ * We also must hold hugetlb vma_lock in write mode.
+ * Lock order dictates acquiring vma_lock BEFORE
+ * i_mmap_rwsem. We can only try lock here and fail
+ * if unsuccessful.
+ */
+ if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
+ struct mmu_gather tlb;
+
+ VM_WARN_ON(!(flags & TTU_RMAP_LOCKED));
+ if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma)) {
+ *exit_walk = true;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ tlb_gather_mmu_vma(&tlb, vma);
+ if (huge_pmd_unshare(&tlb, vma, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte)) {
+ hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
+ huge_pmd_unshare_flush(&tlb, vma);
+ tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
+ /*
+ * The PMD table was unmapped,
+ * consequently unmapping the folio.
+ */
+ *exit_walk = true;
+ return true;
+ }
+ hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
+ tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
+ }
+ *pteval = huge_ptep_clear_flush(vma, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte);
+ if (pte_dirty(*pteval))
+ folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+
+ *exit_walk = false;
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* @arg: enum ttu_flags will be passed to this argument
*/
@@ -2115,56 +2177,15 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
PageAnonExclusive(subpage);
if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
- bool anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
-
- /*
- * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb page
- * in the case where the hugetlb page is poisoned.
- */
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(subpage), subpage);
- /*
- * huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page.
- * There is no way of knowing exactly which PMDs may
- * be cached for this mm, so we must flush them all.
- * start/end were already adjusted above to cover this
- * range.
- */
- flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
+ bool exit_walk;
- /*
- * To call huge_pmd_unshare, i_mmap_rwsem must be
- * held in write mode. Caller needs to explicitly
- * do this outside rmap routines.
- *
- * We also must hold hugetlb vma_lock in write mode.
- * Lock order dictates acquiring vma_lock BEFORE
- * i_mmap_rwsem. We can only try lock here and fail
- * if unsuccessful.
- */
- if (!anon) {
- struct mmu_gather tlb;
-
- VM_BUG_ON(!(flags & TTU_RMAP_LOCKED));
- if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma))
- goto walk_abort;
-
- tlb_gather_mmu_vma(&tlb, vma);
- if (huge_pmd_unshare(&tlb, vma, address, pvmw.pte)) {
- hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
- huge_pmd_unshare_flush(&tlb, vma);
- tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
- /*
- * The PMD table was unmapped,
- * consequently unmapping the folio.
- */
- goto walk_done;
- }
- hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
- tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
+ ret = unmap_hugetlb_folio(vma, folio, &pvmw, subpage,
+ flags, &pteval, &range,
+ &exit_walk);
+ if (exit_walk) {
+ page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
+ break;
}
- pteval = huge_ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
- if (pte_dirty(pteval))
- folio_mark_dirty(folio);
} else if (likely(pte_present(pteval))) {
nr_pages = folio_unmap_pte_batch(folio, &pvmw, flags, pteval);
end_addr = address + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 9:44 [PATCH v3 0/9] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:44 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-05-06 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mm/memory: Batch set uffd-wp markers during zapping Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mm/rmap: batch unmap folios belonging to uffd-wp VMAs Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_dup_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_put_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] mm/rmap: Add batched version of folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] mm/rmap: enable batch unmapping of anonymous folios Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506094504.2588857-3-dev.jain@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox