From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
leiyang@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, jon@nutanix.com,
tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 1/4] tun/tap: add ptr_ring consume helper with netdev queue wakeup
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 18:18:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506181556-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506141033.180450-2-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 04:10:30PM +0200, Simon Schippers wrote:
> Introduce tun_ring_consume() that wraps ptr_ring_consume() and calls
> __tun_wake_queue(). The latter wakes the stopped netdev subqueue once
> half of the ring capacity has been consumed, tracked via the new
> cons_cnt field in tun_file. cons_cnt is updated while holding the ring
> consumer lock, avoiding races. As a safety net, the queue is also woken
> when the ring becomes empty. The point is to allow the queue to be
> stopped when it gets full, which is required for traffic shaping -
> implemented by the following "avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc
> is present". That patch also explains the pairing of the smp_mb()
> of __tun_wake_queue().
>
> Without the corresponding queue stopping, this patch alone causes no
> regression for a tap setup sending to a qemu VM: 1.132 Mpps
> to 1.144 Mpps.
>
> Details: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X at 4.3 GHz, 3200 MHz RAM, isolated QEMU
> threads, pktgen sender; Avg over 50 runs @ 100,000,000 packets;
> SRSO and spectre v2 mitigations disabled.
>
> Co-developed-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index b183189f1853..00ecf128fe8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ struct tun_file {
> struct list_head next;
> struct tun_struct *detached;
> struct ptr_ring tx_ring;
> + int cons_cnt;
> struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;
> };
>
> @@ -557,6 +558,13 @@ void tun_ptr_free(void *ptr)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_ptr_free);
>
> +static void tun_reset_cons_cnt(struct tun_file *tfile)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> + tfile->cons_cnt = 0;
> + spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> +}
> +
> static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile)
> {
> void *ptr;
> @@ -564,6 +572,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile)
> while ((ptr = ptr_ring_consume(&tfile->tx_ring)) != NULL)
> tun_ptr_free(ptr);
>
> + tun_reset_cons_cnt(tfile);
> skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue);
> skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue);
> }
> @@ -730,6 +739,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + tun_reset_cons_cnt(tfile);
> tfile->queue_index = tun->numqueues;
> tfile->socket.sk->sk_shutdown &= ~RCV_SHUTDOWN;
>
> @@ -2115,13 +2125,46 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
> return total;
> }
>
> -static void *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file *tfile, int noblock, int *err)
> +/* Callers must hold ring.consumer_lock */
> +static void __tun_wake_queue(struct tun_struct *tun,
> + struct tun_file *tfile, int consumed)
> +{
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(tun->dev,
> + tfile->queue_index);
> +
> + /* Paired with smp_mb__after_atomic() in tun_net_xmit() */
> + smp_mb();
> + if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)) {
> + tfile->cons_cnt += consumed;
> + if (tfile->cons_cnt >= tfile->tx_ring.size / 2 ||
> + __ptr_ring_empty(&tfile->tx_ring)) {
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> + tfile->cons_cnt = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void *tun_ring_consume(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile)
> +{
> + void *ptr;
> +
> + spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> + ptr = __ptr_ring_consume(&tfile->tx_ring);
> + if (ptr)
> + __tun_wake_queue(tun, tfile, 1);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> + return ptr;
> +}
> +
> +static void *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> + int noblock, int *err)
> {
> DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> void *ptr = NULL;
> int error = 0;
>
> - ptr = ptr_ring_consume(&tfile->tx_ring);
> + ptr = tun_ring_consume(tun, tfile);
> if (ptr)
> goto out;
> if (noblock) {
> @@ -2133,7 +2176,7 @@ static void *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file *tfile, int noblock, int *err)
>
> while (1) {
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> - ptr = ptr_ring_consume(&tfile->tx_ring);
> + ptr = tun_ring_consume(tun, tfile);
> if (ptr)
> break;
> if (signal_pending(current)) {
So based on commit log I expected all calls to ptr_ring_consume to
be replaced with tun_ring_consume, but it looks like tun_queue_purge
still calls ptr_ring_consume.
I suspect that together with patch 4 it can sometimes leave us stuck
with a stopped queue and an empty ring, forever.
> @@ -2170,7 +2213,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>
> if (!ptr) {
> /* Read frames from ring */
> - ptr = tun_ring_recv(tfile, noblock, &err);
> + ptr = tun_ring_recv(tun, tfile, noblock, &err);
> if (!ptr)
> return err;
> }
> @@ -3406,6 +3449,8 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + tun_reset_cons_cnt(tfile);
> +
> mutex_init(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
> tfile->flags = 0;
> @@ -3614,6 +3659,7 @@ static int tun_queue_resize(struct tun_struct *tun)
> for (i = 0; i < tun->numqueues; i++) {
> tfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[i]);
> rings[i] = &tfile->tx_ring;
> + tun_reset_cons_cnt(tfile);
> }
> list_for_each_entry(tfile, &tun->disabled, next)
> rings[i++] = &tfile->tx_ring;
> --
> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 14:10 [PATCH net-next v10 0/4] tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Simon Schippers
2026-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH net-next v10 1/4] tun/tap: add ptr_ring consume helper with netdev queue wakeup Simon Schippers
2026-05-06 22:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-05-07 6:21 ` Simon Schippers
2026-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH net-next v10 2/4] vhost-net: wake queue of tun/tap after ptr_ring consume Simon Schippers
2026-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH net-next v10 3/4] ptr_ring: move free-space check into separate helper Simon Schippers
2026-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH net-next v10 4/4] tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present Simon Schippers
2026-05-06 22:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-06 22:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 6:32 ` Simon Schippers
2026-05-07 15:19 ` Simon Schippers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506181556-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox