From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Akash Goel <akash.goel@arm.com>, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/panthor: Don't use the racy drm_gem_lru_remove() helper
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 18:25:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506182506.204a1ed2@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23c69bee-868d-4142-a96e-36de61f23f4f@arm.com>
On Wed, 6 May 2026 16:40:22 +0100
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> On 06/05/2026 13:16, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > drm_gem_lru_remove() dereference stores drm_gem_object::lru in a local
> > variable that's then dereferenced to acquire the LRU lock. Because this
> > assignment in done without the LRU lock held, it can race with
> s/in/is/ ^^
> > drm_gem_lru_scan() where drm_gem_object::lru is temporarily assigned
> > a stack-allcated LRU that goes away when leaving the function. By
> > the time we dereference this local lru variable, the object might already
> > be gone.
> >
> > It feels like drm_gem_lru_move_tail() was never meant to be used this
> > way, because there's no easy way we can avoid this race unless we defer
> > the locking to the caller. Let's add an explicit LRU for unreclaimable
> > BOs instead, and have all BOs added to this LRU at creation time.
> >
> > Fixes: fb42964e2a76 ("drm/panthor: Add a GEM shrinker")
> > Reported-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/work_items/86
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
>
> With minor typos fixed
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>
> Although an alternative would be to expose drm_gem_lru_remove_locked()
> in some form (maybe a wrapper which requires passing in the lock?)
I considered that too, but I thought it was less invasive to just have
a default LRU to start in at creation time, and end in there's nothing
left to reclaim. It's also what MSM does, so I figured I'd do that too.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c | 5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> > index 4e4607bca7cc..45b71546f83c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> > @@ -190,6 +190,16 @@ struct panthor_device {
> > /** @reclaim.lock: Lock protecting all LRUs */
> > struct mutex lock;
> >
> > + /**
> > + * @reclaim.unreclaimable: unreclaimable BOs
> > + *
> > + * Either the BO is unreclaimable because it has no pages allocated,
> > + * or it's unreclaimable because pages are pinned.
> > + *
> > + * All BOs start in that list at creation time.
> s/that/this/ ^^^^
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> > + */
> > + struct drm_gem_lru unreclaimable;
> > +
> > /**
> > * @reclaim.unused: BOs with unused pages
> > *
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> > index 13295d7a593d..8e31740126e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void panthor_gem_update_reclaim_state_locked(struct panthor_gem_object *bo,
> > drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.gpu_mapped_shared, &bo->base);
> > break;
> > case PANTHOR_GEM_UNRECLAIMABLE:
> > - drm_gem_lru_remove(&bo->base);
> > + drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &bo->base);
> > break;
> > default:
> > drm_WARN(&ptdev->base, true, "invalid GEM reclaim state (%d)\n", new_state);
> > @@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ static struct panthor_gem_object *
> > panthor_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, uint32_t flags,
> > struct panthor_vm *exclusive_vm, u32 usage_flags)
> > {
> > + struct panthor_device *ptdev = container_of(dev, struct panthor_device, base);
> > struct panthor_gem_object *bo;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -1026,6 +1027,7 @@ panthor_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, uint32_t flags,
> > }
> >
> > panthor_gem_debugfs_set_usage_flags(bo, usage_flags);
> > + drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &bo->base);
> > return bo;
> >
> > err_put:
> > @@ -1551,6 +1553,7 @@ int panthor_gem_shrinker_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> > return ret;
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ptdev->reclaim.vms);
> > + drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
> > drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.unused, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
> > drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.mmapped, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
> > drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.gpu_mapped_shared, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 12:16 [PATCH 0/3] drm/panthor: Fix a race in the shrinker logic Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/panthor: Don't use the racy drm_gem_lru_remove() helper Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 15:40 ` Steven Price
2026-05-06 16:25 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/gem: Fix a race between drm_gem_lru_scan() and drm_gem_object_release() Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 13:21 ` Rob Clark
2026-05-06 14:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/gem: Stop exposing the racy/unsafe drm_gem_lru_remove() helper Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 15:40 ` Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506182506.204a1ed2@fedora \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akash.goel@arm.com \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox