From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE4F406294 for ; Thu, 7 May 2026 14:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778164461; cv=none; b=A192+zBnj9pe3PLxzrZNAlarIdw+JG9Y51gUEXMOOddJwnGrMeDkgKpJTIXqGOt8chx873w6n+eL3uNxMJyoEPqbtkk+GPf5GfOyupW//j9z4qK1fofezKy1w5gAR/Iv0t6MzQpFFyGbyyINV7cqOWzEQp5DzJmqG653Ut+sTuY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778164461; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VQ/Saokh+qNsqoGUrQeMP/hADrgCvykOhkDbj/dG1B8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RSPfqsY8Am/G8eEiiu7pFvuqHJJU4xRSzxoarbXYzs7GZhUcO/MXFHUPVh6lIvuzqg6CPLJABdQF86E7uI9B2XtSOyBAhZjlw6WvqBXVDW/0gjvdTxhHG5x8xBe4yll+bWWBGEIZ7JmnIJoyMy+8XoTEVAYP3pYzcSHVkjn841c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=JW9o4x60; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="JW9o4x60" Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4526a8170ceso548648f8f.2 for ; Thu, 07 May 2026 07:34:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1778164458; x=1778769258; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s3j1nccFhQvm0JUf5yUCCDfxuxwWOSInGRVCG3JqpcM=; b=JW9o4x60gxYnyI0GgqKIjGklyqJ0i4RoDo21G8tn6iCvv5/krD92bLSg9EvdDnVnTL UwVCaBNzaN3ochPW6ySwvrqsTCOsfYS1RwWHGsCANkGmXHs1c4bBX8B+y33f/PqyJoKm 1IocjAUxJnw1QE+TZQf/BCJMHuduuhXeIbHWdErU0TZrLbd4z747omtGaksRPAKyvz1H OvavtAfu55S81wmekIwvb9xsFi78CYjLwkKSqp2eoZcRNNhgEHcPPmK8/8TUZZlTjBsY LGfzgGglsYs/Y3KhahsfT+ZgOfvsxsoCA4pLX2Uwdnd/cty2DnTZdCytnSfcsmQ1iVUy DoLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778164458; x=1778769258; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=s3j1nccFhQvm0JUf5yUCCDfxuxwWOSInGRVCG3JqpcM=; b=BOmmZ+DM79jffuxkYUcyiHId4zRiMW70YKcqw8uSsgpjJiqm2SI4gYNqcEOzOkbW6f IRmgYA1NY6465SxnaCnFgNUD+Z/utkcaw1wT6AGyI5BhqIXtWtIBrjZ9Rik3e7FsZ+JK fIGJd5VCuw+rdX2uY/dIAoXy+tcFGV/AK4vv4EMV936qtffyIY5XAwYKVcL408XcpDOp 8kD2SgDNEb5vjvRcjHHBnysLxhWDD7rUwpyfWoCWr+IAnVh/0YeGTET4xqBN76lUqnU9 CkwtqEp149GVEgV0lq/e8h3Tc4P/6OdW1DOVXiI70gBKqYfiUWbd70eU13NkoBh0vKP0 L5Iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw9ezpXP1YcrR0yun+QlmSuHSEXxAl2XeUkRhbfFzzHHxlqSFOo UhnHQtINHn4Kn4CwGNbfzN5o+hB+x35Q+y9dNNJixa5kSf2CwjkbOKFo2Yi2rDkSW1i8Yx6W7fC 3lltld8s= X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiev01gejvRnx8MM67PsDjS+QQS/a7ey1ivpeqObWAJlLHLhUAHkpdVc38inL3MX FHZUyYwrCAug0/4HSKEGOvyc27++znA2Y/hVxkLfj4ECeQWi2dyMKe53Y3FucxWpbtESXNeRdJq X1k6IQmflkjI8We+1LkvtJLXm8TsYMNfetuTw4L1yW9oXJQNli8lEOA++CtiRfXwEu9IkrCdl2n 8wTVHXN4U6Mw03XAMfmrS1wG6BvJP35C/+JRg5M8erCb1HWL8g+lVjs3xx1Tp8c+gWjBvlXVIDU FsIao2HFItPUzpdM572qzkZro27U1BpcS3ZcOrLX76LqBtDq+Y2dcbS3b/BlXytmHfjdTfssfSH 4+TzcoR5ftErbxbxozV6a9UvVyS0q9ccbycj1c246o4/ztBmCLI/q1D8lx66LMGaaMv21/E5/M5 jYQ7e8CowHPwaCFZ6qm1z1VgAdaIKLsK0ULUDLaMns5I+c8Av7D451yh6QyA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:200e:b0:43d:7946:bae5 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4515da96794mr13554195f8f.42.1778164457527; Thu, 07 May 2026 07:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a00:6d43:105:c401:e307:1a37:2e76:ce91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-45054b03df9sm20352362f8f.24.2026.05.07.07.34.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 May 2026 07:34:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Marco Crivellari To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Marco Crivellari , Michal Hocko , "James E . J . Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" Subject: [RFC PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Move long delayed work on system_dfl_long_wq Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 16:34:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20260507143410.337267-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Currently the code enqueue work items using {queue|mod}_delayed_work(), using system_long_wq. This workqueue should be used when long works are expected and it is a per-cpu workqueue. The function(s) end up calling __queue_delayed_work(), which set a global timer that could fire anywhere, enqueuing the work where the timer fired. Unbound works could benefit from scheduler task placement, to optimize performance and power consumption. Long work shouldn't stick to a single CPU. Recently, a new unbound workqueue specific for long running work has been added:     c116737e972e ("workqueue: Add system_dfl_long_wq for long unbound works") Since the workqueue work doesn't rely on per-cpu variables, there is no obvious reason that justify the use of a per-cpu workqueue. So change system_long_wq with system_dfl_long_wq so that the work may benefit from scheduler task placement. Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari --- drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c index d71ab5fdb758..a61cbb079ab4 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static ssize_t store_reconnect_delay(struct device *dev, if (rport->reconnect_delay <= 0 && delay > 0 && rport->state != SRP_RPORT_RUNNING) { - queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work, + queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work, delay * HZ); } else if (delay <= 0) { cancel_delayed_work(&rport->reconnect_work); @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static void srp_reconnect_work(struct work_struct *work) delay = rport->reconnect_delay * clamp(rport->failed_reconnects - 10, 1, 100); if (delay > 0) - queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, + queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work, delay * HZ); } } @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static void __srp_start_tl_fail_timers(struct srp_rport *rport) if (rport->state == SRP_RPORT_LOST) return; if (delay > 0) - queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work, + queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &rport->reconnect_work, 1UL * delay * HZ); if ((fast_io_fail_tmo >= 0 || dev_loss_tmo >= 0) && srp_rport_set_state(rport, SRP_RPORT_BLOCKED) == 0) { @@ -482,11 +482,11 @@ static void __srp_start_tl_fail_timers(struct srp_rport *rport) rport->state); scsi_block_targets(shost, &shost->shost_gendev); if (fast_io_fail_tmo >= 0) - queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, + queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &rport->fast_io_fail_work, 1UL * fast_io_fail_tmo * HZ); if (dev_loss_tmo >= 0) - queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, + queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &rport->dev_loss_work, 1UL * dev_loss_tmo * HZ); } -- 2.53.0