Re: [PATCH v17 05/11] cxl: Limit CXL-CPER kfifo registration functions scope

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 5 May 2026 12:30:23 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> wrote:

> From: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
> 
> Some CPER functions used by CXL drivers are exported using the
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(fn, ns) macro. This doesn't provide compile time
> enforcement or visibility of the consumers.
> 
> This can be improved by using EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES() instead.
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES() explicitly names the modules that can access
> the function. This provides more precise control and visibility of symbol
> exposure than the namespace macro. It also provides compile time checking.
> 
> To improve control and clarity, update cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(),
> cxl_cper_unregister_prot_err_work(), and cxl_cper_prot_err_kfifo_get()
> to use EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(). Also, update the register and unregister
> functions to return void type.
> 
> Update the CPER kfifo unregister to cancel work while using
> synchronization.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
One suggestion on simplifying the code by removing any assumption that
cxl_ras_init() can fail.


> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> index 56611da8357a..9193dac4e507 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> @@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(cxl_cper_prot_err_work, cxl_cper_prot_err_work_fn);
>  
>  int cxl_ras_init(void)
>  {
> -	return cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
> +	cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
> +	return 0;

I'm lazy and haven't read on, but if this never gains a failure
path can we change the signature whilst we are here to stop
pretending it does?

>  }