From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jianpeng Chang <jianpeng.chang.cn@windriver.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, leon@kernel.org, kbusch@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: remove bogus test for pfn_valid from dma_map_resource
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 08:31:00 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508113100.GA9285@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89094011-fe78-40f9-9695-d50ee19167c5@windriver.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:01:01PM +0800, Jianpeng Chang wrote:
> > As I said last time, I think pfn_valid() && !PageReserved(pfn_to_page())
> > would be enough for what we want here, although now it's strictly under
> > CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG, perhaps the overhead of memblock_is_map_memory()
> > might be less of an issue. Either way though, now that it's all
> > channelled through the single dma_map_phys() path, it would probably
> > make sense to consolidate any MMIO sanity-checking into
> > dma_debug_map_phys() anyway :/
> Thanks for the suggestion. Move the check into debug_dma_map_phys() is
> indeed better, and I will replace pfn_valid() with pfn_valid() &&
> !PageReserved() as you suggested.
I'm not sure that is right. IIRC pfn_valid() is true for ZONE_DEVICE
P2P pages that are used with map_phys but never with map_resource.
PageReserved isn't enough to fix it.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 3:21 [PATCH] dma-mapping: remove bogus test for pfn_valid from dma_map_resource Jianpeng Chang
2026-05-07 13:18 ` Robin Murphy
2026-05-08 10:01 ` Jianpeng Chang
2026-05-08 11:01 ` Robin Murphy
2026-05-08 11:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-05-08 12:16 ` Robin Murphy
2026-05-08 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-08 16:04 ` Robin Murphy
2026-05-08 17:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-08 19:11 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508113100.GA9285@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jianpeng.chang.cn@windriver.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox