The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Salman Alghamdi <me@cipherat.com>
Cc: luka.gejak@linux.dev, straube.linux@gmail.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] staging: rtl8723bs: fix buffer over-read in rtw_update_protection
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 07:00:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026050839-remover-barrack-8511@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb3759ee-ecfb-f707-4105-6029d236ce3a@cipherat.com>

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 12:56:09AM +0300, Salman Alghamdi wrote:
> On May 04, 2026 12:35 +03, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > You should not mix patches for the current release (i.e. this one), with
> > patches for the next release (i.e. the rest of the patches in this
> > series), as that means I can't take the full series for either :(
> > 
> > Please break this up into two different sets of patches and resend them
> > that way.
> 
> Hi Greg,
> Thank you for the review.
> 
> Two questions before I resend:
> 1. How do I tell which release a patch targets? Is it purely based on whether it's a bug fix (current release) vs. a new change (next release), or is there a more specific rule I should follow?

That is exactly what it is based on.

> 2. For versioning the split series, should the bug fix patch restart at v1, and the rest of the series continue at v7? Or should I keep them sequential (bug fix as v7, next-release patches as v8)?

two separate series, so yes, split it that way should be fine.

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260428164513.763471-1-me@cipherat.com>
     [not found] ` <20260428164513.763471-2-me@cipherat.com>
     [not found]   ` <2026050434-construct-starter-5468@gregkh>
2026-05-07 21:56     ` [PATCH v6 1/8] staging: rtl8723bs: fix buffer over-read in rtw_update_protection Salman Alghamdi
2026-05-08  5:00       ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026050839-remover-barrack-8511@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=me@cipherat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox