From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kas@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
yan.y.zhao@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Plumb "sp" _pointer_ into the TDP MMU's handle_changed_spte()
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 15:56:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260509075622.4258-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509075201.4077-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Plumb the "sp" pointer into handle_changed_spte() to allow checking of
is_mirror_sp(sp) in handle_changed_spte() in the next patch. This is a
preparation to consolidate all S-EPT updates into a single kvm_x86_ops
hook.
[Yan: Remove unused "as_id" param in tdp_mmu_set_spte() ]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
---
MMU_refactors v2:
-Split out and added back this patch.
(The patch was in Sean's original series, and had "SPTE" instead of "sp"
in title). (Yan)
- Remove unused "as_id" param in tdp_mmu_set_spte(). (Yan).
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 345fdb0a89fb..05dc8bdc1ea5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -320,9 +320,9 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_alloc_root(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool mirror)
}
}
-static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
- u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, int level,
- bool shared);
+static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+ gfn_t gfn, u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte,
+ int level, bool shared);
static void tdp_account_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
@@ -471,8 +471,7 @@ static void handle_removed_pt(struct kvm *kvm, tdp_ptep_t pt, bool shared)
old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(sptep, old_spte,
FROZEN_SPTE, level);
}
- handle_changed_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), gfn,
- old_spte, FROZEN_SPTE, level, shared);
+ handle_changed_spte(kvm, sp, gfn, old_spte, FROZEN_SPTE, level, shared);
if (is_mirror_sp(sp)) {
KVM_BUG_ON(shared, kvm);
@@ -498,7 +497,7 @@ static void handle_removed_pt(struct kvm *kvm, tdp_ptep_t pt, bool shared)
/**
* handle_changed_spte - handle bookkeeping associated with an SPTE change
* @kvm: kvm instance
- * @as_id: the address space of the paging structure the SPTE was a part of
+ * @sp: the page table in which the SPTE resides
* @gfn: the base GFN that was mapped by the SPTE
* @old_spte: The value of the SPTE before the change
* @new_spte: The value of the SPTE after the change
@@ -511,15 +510,16 @@ static void handle_removed_pt(struct kvm *kvm, tdp_ptep_t pt, bool shared)
* dirty logging updates are handled in common code, not here (see make_spte()
* and fast_pf_fix_direct_spte()).
*/
-static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
- u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, int level,
- bool shared)
+static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+ gfn_t gfn, u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte,
+ int level, bool shared)
{
bool was_present = is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte);
bool is_present = is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte);
bool was_leaf = was_present && is_last_spte(old_spte, level);
bool is_leaf = is_present && is_last_spte(new_spte, level);
bool pfn_changed = spte_to_pfn(old_spte) != spte_to_pfn(new_spte);
+ int as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp);
WARN_ON_ONCE(level > PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
WARN_ON_ONCE(level < PG_LEVEL_4K);
@@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
struct tdp_iter *iter,
u64 new_spte)
{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
@@ -676,7 +677,7 @@ static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
if (ret)
return ret;
- handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
+ handle_changed_spte(kvm, sp, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
new_spte, iter->level, true);
return 0;
@@ -685,7 +686,6 @@ static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
/*
* tdp_mmu_set_spte - Set a TDP MMU SPTE and handle the associated bookkeeping
* @kvm: KVM instance
- * @as_id: Address space ID, i.e. regular vs. SMM
* @sptep: Pointer to the SPTE
* @old_spte: The current value of the SPTE
* @new_spte: The new value that will be set for the SPTE
@@ -695,9 +695,11 @@ static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
* Returns the old SPTE value, which _may_ be different than @old_spte if the
* SPTE had voldatile bits.
*/
-static u64 tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
- u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, gfn_t gfn, int level)
+static u64 tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 old_spte,
+ u64 new_spte, gfn_t gfn, int level)
{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(sptep));
+
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
/*
@@ -711,7 +713,7 @@ static u64 tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(sptep, old_spte, new_spte, level);
- handle_changed_spte(kvm, as_id, gfn, old_spte, new_spte, level, false);
+ handle_changed_spte(kvm, sp, gfn, old_spte, new_spte, level, false);
/*
* Users that do non-atomic setting of PTEs don't operate on mirror
@@ -729,9 +731,8 @@ static inline void tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
u64 new_spte)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded);
- iter->old_spte = tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->sptep,
- iter->old_spte, new_spte,
- iter->gfn, iter->level);
+ iter->old_spte = tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter->sptep, iter->old_spte,
+ new_spte, iter->gfn, iter->level);
}
#define tdp_root_for_each_pte(_iter, _kvm, _root, _start, _end) \
--
2.43.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-09 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 7:52 [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU refactors Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: TDX: Drop kvm_x86_ops.link_external_spt() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: TDX: Wrap mapping of leaf and non-leaf S-EPT entries into helpers Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Fold set_external_spte_present() into its sole caller Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Plumb param "old_spte" into kvm_x86_ops.set_external_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: TDX: Move KVM_BUG_ON()s in __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() to TDX code Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: TDX: Move lockdep assert " Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Morph !is_frozen_spte() check into a KVM_MMU_WARN_ON() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Centrally propagate to-present/atomic zap updates to external PTEs Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop KVM_BUG_ON() on shared lock to zap child " Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: TDX: Hoist tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() above set_private_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: TDX: Drop kvm_x86_ops.remove_external_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: TDX: Rename tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() to show it's for leaf SPTEs Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Move error handling inside free_external_spt() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: TDX: Move external page table freeing to TDX code Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260509075622.4258-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox