The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Samir M <samir@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v1 11/12] rcu: Latch normal synchronize_rcu() path on flood
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 19:54:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260511175448.153326-12-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511175448.153326-1-urezki@gmail.com>

Currently, rcu_normal_wake_from_gp is only enabled by default
on small systems(<= 16 CPUs) or when a user explicitly set it
enabled.

Introduce an adaptive latching mechanism:
 * Track the number of in-flight synchronize_rcu() requests
   using a new rcu_sr_normal_count counter;

 * If the count reaches/exceeds RCU_SR_NORMAL_LATCH_THR(64),
   it sets the rcu_sr_normal_latched, reverting new requests
   onto the scaled wait_rcu_gp() path;

 * The latch is cleared only when the pending requests are fully
   drained(nr == 0);

 * Enables rcu_normal_wake_from_gp by default for all systems,
   relying on this dynamic throttling instead of static CPU
   limits.

Testing(synthetic flood workload):
  * Kernel version: 6.19.0-rc6
  * Number of CPUs: 1536
  * 60K concurrent synchronize_rcu() calls

Perf(cycles, system-wide):
  total cycles: 932020263832
  rcu_sr_normal_add_req(): 2650282811 cycles(~0.28%)

Perf report excerpt:
  0.01%  0.01%  sync_test/...  [k] rcu_sr_normal_add_req

Measured overhead of rcu_sr_normal_add_req() remained ~0.28%
of total CPU cycles in this synthetic stress test.

Tested-by: Samir M <samir@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 10 ++--
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 52 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 4d0f545fb3ec..d5db2e85d551 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -5862,13 +5862,13 @@ Kernel parameters
 			use a call_rcu[_hurry]() path. Please note, this is for a
 			normal grace period.
 
-			How to enable it:
+			How to disable it:
 
-			echo 1 > /sys/module/rcutree/parameters/rcu_normal_wake_from_gp
-			or pass a boot parameter "rcutree.rcu_normal_wake_from_gp=1"
+			echo 0 > /sys/module/rcutree/parameters/rcu_normal_wake_from_gp
+			or pass a boot parameter "rcutree.rcu_normal_wake_from_gp=0"
 
-			Default is 1 if num_possible_cpus() <= 16 and it is not explicitly
-			disabled by the boot parameter passing 0.
+			Default is 1 if it is not explicitly disabled by the boot parameter
+			passing 0.
 
 	rcuscale.gp_async= [KNL]
 			Measure performance of asynchronous
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 09f0cef5014c..94274330d1db 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1632,17 +1632,21 @@ static void rcu_sr_put_wait_head(struct llist_node *node)
 	atomic_set_release(&sr_wn->inuse, 0);
 }
 
-/* Enable rcu_normal_wake_from_gp automatically on small systems. */
-#define WAKE_FROM_GP_CPU_THRESHOLD 16
-
-static int rcu_normal_wake_from_gp = -1;
+static int rcu_normal_wake_from_gp = 1;
 module_param(rcu_normal_wake_from_gp, int, 0644);
 static struct workqueue_struct *sync_wq;
 
+#define RCU_SR_NORMAL_LATCH_THR 64
+
+/* Number of in-flight synchronize_rcu() calls queued on srs_next. */
+static atomic_long_t rcu_sr_normal_count;
+static int rcu_sr_normal_latched; /* 0/1 */
+
 static void rcu_sr_normal_complete(struct llist_node *node)
 {
 	struct rcu_synchronize *rs = container_of(
 		(struct rcu_head *) node, struct rcu_synchronize, head);
+	long nr;
 
 	WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) &&
 		!poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&rs->oldstate),
@@ -1650,6 +1654,15 @@ static void rcu_sr_normal_complete(struct llist_node *node)
 
 	/* Finally. */
 	complete(&rs->completion);
+	nr = atomic_long_dec_return(&rcu_sr_normal_count);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(nr < 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Unlatch: switch back to normal path when fully
+	 * drained and if it has been latched.
+	 */
+	if (nr == 0)
+		(void)cmpxchg(&rcu_sr_normal_latched, 1, 0);
 }
 
 static void rcu_sr_normal_gp_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -1795,6 +1808,24 @@ static bool rcu_sr_normal_gp_init(void)
 
 static void rcu_sr_normal_add_req(struct rcu_synchronize *rs)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Increment before publish to avoid a complete
+	 * vs enqueue race on latch.
+	 */
+	long nr = atomic_long_inc_return(&rcu_sr_normal_count);
+
+	/*
+	 * Latch when threshold is reached. Checking for an exact match
+	 * restricts cmpxchg() to a single context.
+	 *
+	 * This latch is intentionally relaxed and best-effort. Concurrent
+	 * set/clear can race and temporarily lose the latch, which is OK
+	 * because it only selects between the fast and fallback paths.
+	 */
+	if (nr == RCU_SR_NORMAL_LATCH_THR)
+		(void)cmpxchg(&rcu_sr_normal_latched, 0, 1);
+
+	/* Publish for the GP kthread/worker. */
 	llist_add((struct llist_node *) &rs->head, &rcu_state.srs_next);
 }
 
@@ -3278,14 +3309,15 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_normal(void)
 {
 	struct rcu_synchronize rs;
 
+	init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs.head);
 	trace_rcu_sr_normal(rcu_state.name, &rs.head, TPS("request"));
 
-	if (READ_ONCE(rcu_normal_wake_from_gp) < 1) {
+	if (READ_ONCE(rcu_normal_wake_from_gp) < 1 ||
+			READ_ONCE(rcu_sr_normal_latched)) {
 		wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_hurry);
 		goto trace_complete_out;
 	}
 
-	init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs.head);
 	init_completion(&rs.completion);
 
 	/*
@@ -3302,10 +3334,10 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_normal(void)
 
 	/* Now we can wait. */
 	wait_for_completion(&rs.completion);
-	destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs.head);
 
 trace_complete_out:
 	trace_rcu_sr_normal(rcu_state.name, &rs.head, TPS("complete"));
+	destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs.head);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -4904,12 +4936,6 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
 	sync_wq = alloc_workqueue("sync_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
 	WARN_ON(!sync_wq);
 
-	/* Respect if explicitly disabled via a boot parameter. */
-	if (rcu_normal_wake_from_gp < 0) {
-		if (num_possible_cpus() <= WAKE_FROM_GP_CPU_THRESHOLD)
-			rcu_normal_wake_from_gp = 1;
-	}
-
 	/* Fill in default value for rcutree.qovld boot parameter. */
 	/* -After- the rcu_node ->lock fields are initialized! */
 	if (qovld < 0)
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 17:54 [PATCH -next v1 00/12] Candidate patches for the v7.2 merge window Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 01/12] rcutorture: Fully test lazy RCU Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 02/12] torture: Add torture_sched_set_normal() for user-specified nice values Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 03/12] torture: Improve kvm-series.sh header comment Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 04/12] torture: Allow "norm" abbreviation for "normal" Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 05/12] srcu: Don't queue workqueue handlers to never-online CPUs Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 06/12] srcu: Fix kerneldoc header comment typo in srcu_down_read_fast() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 07/12] checkpatch: Undeprecate rcu_read_lock_trace() and rcu_read_unlock_trace() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 08/12] rcu: Simplify rcu_do_batch() by applying clamp() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 09/12] rcu: Simplify param_set_next_fqs_jiffies() by applying clamp_val() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 10/12] rcu: Document rcu_access_pointer() feeding into cmpxchg() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2026-05-11 17:54 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2026-05-11 17:54 ` [PATCH -next v1 12/12] rcu-tasks: Fix possible boot-time tests failed for the call_rcu_tasks() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260511175448.153326-12-urezki@gmail.com \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samir@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox