From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65F834014B4 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 16:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778516024; cv=none; b=fDgCVhJQ9CeVVdze0le0xy3e5zkbmNQeI4BZbnEpNq9YPKczN/p16io59Wvk33nrpbq28M3K24DHgTeAOGLkmwVbmJdLn2cLV1MV+hqIvLBaPVLN1iAjgK5yUwOUl34m+rvIHJtUa6E9u5v8LvPScf8lxtc7rynV4CFO/8cKr7U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778516024; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1TzaCDI1+JWxmUau8vYOJqiF9XlrFrSbb3k3byq/E5Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Er9LEQJEH+Zk/SuoBSK0Ea17lWKMFUg3d750gtAIQ1dSeG6eZ5sxH8RFx60QQDEI5c/D0PZJ0qQKVbv0eyxEBrOOQc7SRc8Lf2GoH5m+PYQPLl9oQmIV58vKFaw7GF5vRaW0po/TOB7FouVPlDE1QE9mjaFeT8xQlfTEjlq1w2Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=fZB0OdV2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="fZB0OdV2" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 994F9C5E14B; Mon, 11 May 2026 16:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4C960646; Mon, 11 May 2026 16:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id AB74111AF9F45; Mon, 11 May 2026 18:13:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1778516019; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=9QJE5rWP/MNjg3svbbHFxSI4hthH0tMoTvM+RF9P1Is=; b=fZB0OdV2hsw5usHJBb9ov/CKadtw9OCv86zTjUQRiiPHNCft7HOFEEGmQWMP60bYIPidDp 9lA+rU20RnirftJ69NixUrg+ySxp+18xTl3L6CJoLL8+Jpte8ntDzghkUc1A7A2rqljqeW /ouM5myLwZZSosd0/s8CyNtcV6guIBkJjK+Zk9PRKizAhdHKoR6Dq3VVb3HiuhEqHt4+n4 HIobfL7jW1iF5O7oXYogUkSxZRN7OifScmHzJWGd3pkoN2OQqKlEl9loLSwlHNQKoVPPqJ 7Cc1DawrSGoc6oe8MhMmMrO93FGT5zJyTTTLuQf7gdFLkWV7fJcxlK5Q6HuuGw== Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 18:13:34 +0200 From: Herve Codina To: Wolfram Sang , Andi Shyti Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Allan Nielsen , Horatiu Vultur , Daniel Machon , Steen Hegelund , Luca Ceresoli , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/1] lan966x pci device: Add support for SFPs, clock dependency part Message-ID: <20260511181334.26fc869f@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20260511160128.34786-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> References: <20260511160128.34786-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hi Wolfram, Andi, On Mon, 11 May 2026 18:01:26 +0200 Herve Codina wrote: > Hi, > > Previously, I sent a big picture series adding support for SFP ports > available on the LAN966x PCI device [0]. > > In this series patches touch several parts and sub-system in the kernel. > Reviews have be done and it makes sense to split the series and send > parts separately. > > This current series is the extraction of a patch related to a clock > build dependency issues. Oups, this was not the correct series. Nothing to do with i2c. A wrong command on my side. The serie has been already sent to correct (clock) maintainers. Please ignore this one on i2c side. Sorry for the noise. Best regards, Hervé