From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CAD39BFEF; Mon, 11 May 2026 07:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778485413; cv=none; b=i8v5kNnydP/0nM1S80i62OQoiFJaJrmhGWzyvmagfXIqJI4SrKWd7LJ7oqnSAPNGGXpjWGOX8UGri2OckRkyQghwXNTPx65/EiUAJeZ3TXAtPdApBQzH4YIdRpQEnjUioWtnheSjoHJbsUu+WZMsu0lpHhf0Xj4mCc6kF3sYgcQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778485413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KF8sHqz/JvnoiKFHwKuJfkvq/1IoURc1ehGDQFIstXc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PBoEbCcPPDfJqPjK8Oc8ASv3eMXz3+oxJtp53A0HUqEQnf3W1GkObHRbowZTLuU1eAMLDAk2Z6wC2h8YZCgp13f5E6qFBOtq7JlXN2qQgQFl5vU0rJKYmGxH0Nte6EFBQ8bWaqSuXKk5peCPnROaqNru6inITmEfkLKHbSvYCdY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=2FSeUsUY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="2FSeUsUY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79334C2BCB0; Mon, 11 May 2026 07:43:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1778485411; bh=KF8sHqz/JvnoiKFHwKuJfkvq/1IoURc1ehGDQFIstXc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2FSeUsUYfDcATojeJD4LzQ/jCc4YCCsdvu4Cyv+s6BSdmKvD/r+KIgoM5c8KtEc00 NusAnLAhDvRYJdsjkD+phmmPhcg794jUhYwnc68JtCn20qBvJkW7sY237Cgxbb6elU yUqB9KRScHFtISVeADjhbnxUk3g/j1ZAyB/UG7oA= Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 09:43:29 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Hanu-man12shaw Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Hanu-man12shaw Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vme_user: fix lines exceeding 80 characters in vme_tsi148.c Message-ID: <2026051154-pang-phosphate-ea18@gregkh> References: <20260510174215.1444-1-harshit116@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260510174215.1444-1-harshit116@gmail.com> On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 05:42:15PM +0000, Hanu-man12shaw wrote: > Signed-off-by: Hanu-man12shaw > --- > drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_tsi148.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_tsi148.c b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_tsi148.c > index 4cf3486646ce..0e8a67fbf562 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_tsi148.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_tsi148.c > @@ -755,7 +755,8 @@ static int tsi148_alloc_resource(struct vme_master_resource *image, > size, 0x10000, PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM, > 0, NULL, NULL); > if (retval) { > - dev_err(tsi148_bridge->parent, "Failed to allocate mem resource for window %d size 0x%lx start 0x%lx\n", > + dev_err(tsi148_bridge->parent, > + "Failed to allocate mem resource for window %d size 0x%lx start 0x%lx\n", > image->number, (unsigned long)size, > (unsigned long)image->bus_resource.start); > goto err_resource; > @@ -2252,7 +2253,8 @@ static int tsi148_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > struct vme_lm_resource *lm; > > if (geoid >= VME_MAX_SLOTS) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "VME geographical address must be between 0 and %d (exclusive), but got %d\n", > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > + "VME geographical address must be between 0 and %d (exclusive), but got %d\n", > VME_MAX_SLOTS, geoid); > return -EINVAL; > } > -- > 2.53.0 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - You sent multiple patches, yet no indication of which ones should be applied in which order. Greg could just guess, but if you are receiving this email, he guessed wrong and the patches didn't apply. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for a description of how to do this so that Greg has a chance to apply these correctly. - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to match). Please read the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for how to do this correctly. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot