From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com>
Cc: greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
vireshk@kernel.org, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] greybus: authentication: validate CAP response payload size
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 09:53:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026051156-hamster-plating-7ae7@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260504233328.7409-1-meatuni001@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 07:33:28PM -0400, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> cap_get_ims_certificate() and cap_authenticate() copy variable-length
> response data directly into fixed-size UAPI buffers using the
> untrusted op->response->payload_size value without any bounds checks.
>
> A malicious or compromised Greybus endpoint can return an oversized
> certificate or signature payload, causing a kernel heap overflow.
>
> Fix both functions by:
> - Rejecting responses shorter than sizeof(*response) with -EPROTO.
> - Rejecting payloads exceeding CAP_CERTIFICATE_MAX_SIZE (1600) or
> CAP_SIGNATURE_MAX_SIZE (320) with -EMSGSIZE.
> - Copying only the validated size into the UAPI buffer.
>
> Fixes: e3eda54d0b5f ("greybus: Add Component Authentication Protocol support")
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/authentication.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Was this tested on any real greybus devices?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-04 23:33 [PATCH v1] greybus: authentication: validate CAP response payload size Muhammad Bilal
2026-05-11 7:53 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-05-11 12:35 ` 0nsec
2026-05-11 12:41 ` Muhammad Bilal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026051156-hamster-plating-7ae7@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=meatuni001@gmail.com \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox