From: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com>
To: jgg@ziepe.ca
Cc: Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com, amhetre@nvidia.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
joonwonkang@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, jpb@kernel.org,
kees@kernel.org, kevin.tian@intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
praan@google.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, smostafa@google.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iommu: Enable per-device SSID space for SVA
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 10:07:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512100742.2522825-1-joonwonkang@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509171013.GF9285@ziepe.ca>
> > We have multiple processes and a single device, those processes want to
> > do SVA with the same device, and only one process will do SVA with the
> > device at a time. Though, the problem occurs even when irrelevant
> > processes allocate the PASIDs from the global PASID space for their own
> > irrelevant purposes.
>
> The only way to allocate a PASID from the global PASID space is to
> establish another SVA, so you have multiple devices doing SVA?
Another way is via iommu_alloc_global_pasid() [1] and it does not require
SVA. No, we currently do not have multiple devices doing SVA. But, the
problem is that it is out of our control when any device is to allocate a
PASID or do SVA for its own purpose.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230802212427.1497170-3-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
Thanks,
Joonwon Kang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260424085339.3503582-1-joonwonkang@google.com>
[not found] ` <20260424133953.GY3611611@ziepe.ca>
2026-05-07 8:15 ` [PATCH RFC] iommu: Enable per-device SSID space for SVA Tian, Kevin
2026-05-09 17:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07 9:58 ` Joonwon Kang
2026-05-09 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-11 12:39 ` Robin Murphy
2026-05-11 13:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-12 9:57 ` Joonwon Kang
2026-05-12 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-12 13:53 ` Robin Murphy
2026-05-12 14:51 ` Joonwon Kang
2026-05-12 15:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-12 10:07 ` Joonwon Kang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260512100742.2522825-1-joonwonkang@google.com \
--to=joonwonkang@google.com \
--cc=Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com \
--cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox