From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>,
Xiaosen He <xiaosen.he@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: flush plug in schedule_preempt_disabled() to prevent deadlock
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 14:04:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512120431.GC1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512085939.1107372-1-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 04:59:39PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On preemptible kernels, a deadlock can occur when a task with plugged IO
> calls schedule_preempt_disabled():
>
> schedule_preempt_disabled()
> sched_preempt_enable_no_resched() // preemption now enabled
> schedule() // <-- preemption can happen here
> sched_submit_work()
> blk_flush_plug()
>
> After sched_preempt_enable_no_resched() re-enables preemption, the task
> can be preempted (e.g., by a higher-priority RT task) before reaching
> blk_flush_plug() in sched_submit_work(). Since the task's state is
> already TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE (set by the mutex/rwsem slowpath caller),
> requests in current->plug remain unflushed for an unbounded time.
>
> If another task depends on those plugged requests to make progress (e.g.,
> to release a lock the sleeping task needs), a deadlock results:
>
> - Task A (writeback worker): holds plugged IO, preempted before
> flushing, stuck on run queue behind higher-priority work
> - Task B: waiting for IO completion from Task A's plug, holds a lock
> that Task A needs to be woken up
>
> Both reported deadlocks involve mutex/rwsem slowpaths, which are the
> primary callers of schedule_preempt_disabled() with non-running task
> state.
>
> Fix by flushing the plug in schedule_preempt_disabled() while
> preemption is still disabled. This ensures the plug is empty before the
> preemption window opens.
How is this different from any path calling schedule()? That would be
subject to exactly the same issue.
The patch cannot be correct.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 8:59 [PATCH] sched: flush plug in schedule_preempt_disabled() to prevent deadlock Ming Lei
2026-05-12 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-12 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 15:45 ` Ming Lei
2026-05-12 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 16:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 17:16 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260512120431.GC1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@allwinnertech.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=xiaosen.he@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox