The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>,
	Xiaosen He <xiaosen.he@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: flush plug in schedule_preempt_disabled() to prevent deadlock
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 14:04:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512120431.GC1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512085939.1107372-1-tom.leiming@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 04:59:39PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On preemptible kernels, a deadlock can occur when a task with plugged IO
> calls schedule_preempt_disabled():
> 
>   schedule_preempt_disabled()
>     sched_preempt_enable_no_resched()  // preemption now enabled
>     schedule()                         // <-- preemption can happen here
>       sched_submit_work()
>         blk_flush_plug()
> 
> After sched_preempt_enable_no_resched() re-enables preemption, the task
> can be preempted (e.g., by a higher-priority RT task) before reaching
> blk_flush_plug() in sched_submit_work(). Since the task's state is
> already TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE (set by the mutex/rwsem slowpath caller),
> requests in current->plug remain unflushed for an unbounded time.
> 
> If another task depends on those plugged requests to make progress (e.g.,
> to release a lock the sleeping task needs), a deadlock results:
> 
>   - Task A (writeback worker): holds plugged IO, preempted before
>     flushing, stuck on run queue behind higher-priority work
>   - Task B: waiting for IO completion from Task A's plug, holds a lock
>     that Task A needs to be woken up
> 
> Both reported deadlocks involve mutex/rwsem slowpaths, which are the
> primary callers of schedule_preempt_disabled() with non-running task
> state.
> 
> Fix by flushing the plug in schedule_preempt_disabled() while
> preemption is still disabled. This ensures the plug is empty before the
> preemption window opens.

How is this different from any path calling schedule()? That would be
subject to exactly the same issue.

The patch cannot be correct.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12  8:59 [PATCH] sched: flush plug in schedule_preempt_disabled() to prevent deadlock Ming Lei
2026-05-12 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-12 12:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 15:45     ` Ming Lei
2026-05-12 16:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 16:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 17:16       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260512120431.GC1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@allwinnertech.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=xiaosen.he@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox