The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Muralidhara M K <muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	Nayak K Prateek <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] sysfs: Add SYSFS_HUGE_BIN_FILE flag for binary attributes larger than PAGE_SIZE
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 14:01:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026051214-getaway-mammary-debb@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427155129.545327-5-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:21:26PM +0530, Muralidhara M K wrote:
> Historically, sysfs read buffers were allocated with get_zeroed_page(),
> limiting reads to PAGE_SIZE.  Commit 13c589d5b0ac ("sysfs: use seq_file
> when reading regular files") transitioned regular (text) attribute reads
> to seq_file, which can dynamically grow buffers beyond PAGE_SIZE.
> However, the PAGE_SIZE limit was intentionally preserved for
> compatibility.  When binary attribute handling was later unified into
> the same codebase, the non-seq_file read path (kernfs_file_read_iter)
> retained this PAGE_SIZE cap for binary files as well.
> 
> Drivers that expose binary attributes larger than PAGE_SIZE — such as
> the AMD HSMP metric table (~13 KB) — cannot deliver the full content
> in a single read() call through the existing path.

That's fine, userspace must be able to handle a "short" read, and will
just continue on and read everything afterward, right?  You can't rely
on userspace always asking for more data.

> Introduce a new opt-in flag SYSFS_HUGE_BIN_FILE (040000) that drivers
> can OR into their bin_attribute mode.  When set, sysfs selects a new
> kernfs_ops (sysfs_bin_kfops_huge_file_ro) whose .seq_show callback
> pipes the bin_attribute ->read() result through seq_file, allowing
> reads of arbitrary size in one shot.  Existing binary attributes
> without the flag continue using the legacy capped path.

If this is such a big issue, why not just do it always for binary files?
What is the benefit of keeping two different code paths just for this
"new" flag?

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260427155129.545327-1-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
     [not found] ` <20260427155129.545327-3-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
2026-05-08  5:12   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add metrics table support for Family 1Ah Model 50h-5Fh Suma Hegde
2026-05-11 17:38   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-12  6:24     ` M K, Muralidhara
     [not found] ` <20260427155129.545327-4-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
2026-05-08  5:13   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Unify response_sz validation to an upper-bound check Suma Hegde
2026-05-11 11:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] AMD HSMP: metrics table improvements and Family 1Ah Model 50h-5Fh support M K, Muralidhara
     [not found] ` <20260427155129.545327-7-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
2026-05-11 17:27   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Make metric table read locking use guard(mutex) Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-12  6:26     ` M K, Muralidhara
     [not found] ` <20260427155129.545327-2-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
2026-05-11 17:35   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add new HSMP messages for Family 1Ah, Model 50h-5Fh Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-12  6:21     ` M K, Muralidhara
     [not found] ` <20260427155129.545327-5-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
2026-05-12  6:28   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sysfs: Add SYSFS_HUGE_BIN_FILE flag for binary attributes larger than PAGE_SIZE M K, Muralidhara
2026-05-12 11:44   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-13  3:59     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 12:01   ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-05-13  4:13     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13  6:24       ` Greg KH
2026-05-13  6:36         ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13  7:18           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026051214-getaway-mammary-debb@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=muralidhara.mk@amd.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox