From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53987394463 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 21:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778622910; cv=none; b=YXxbawD+YIOMEOOUmPlNleYrlF55ndbzOvVsDshBRL/TwNZziOuGYQFlz/WtQbIVjJ/y9e5kS92qX+eEaCsHDlZvCyfSJhNJVGHAhF7UPzAI77do1Kv7tCx5HunVIfgENLf5/w6vRL4NNdahobO46RoOxvUbriQawCU9g5o2OFM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778622910; c=relaxed/simple; bh=reuPeR5st+dNjQ+dUnUpP6RytIN2DJ+Tp7VAQwercNQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=kLai8kiGu4WyenKItjNJ+ibeudtMhNUjDLGRZflyFkbsBs4y9kdqLBvBkgOZXHeHKkCv9v4gl8I+wES1Ge36VHnI8GjhjD9G+QT+5Kxa7zs3w/2TtA2j0W4SpI1Z/VFmg5HmzPPbYIbGModAsq6uy2RC4yKT2Q3ekdktbB2Pfs0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=N1ww8I9i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="N1ww8I9i" Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-367d88b9940so2772951a91.1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 14:55:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1778622908; x=1779227708; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9nTYItNBEtJamr9+Qzv1BppMHRb0qZCJCrUuytaYaF0=; b=N1ww8I9ilxYYwzVoA1zQfsqh9AE/Fnfno45zOPpuBlhwAsZjVLY04NHry8axtMI2NA z+EQCom2rmmbaX9ZcgJ5HEQK4CL9iPVOmurfhrMb/DtFgYpu0Q+r5PUxjpq1ZSrUTTFq 8CPAYmh7i0uGAbkIvpAtV2q57EHwABKz2wgXx3jx0BCam6FvH1+YS2mJf9LadON4MOSg Y1nD0HNdHJpnCyD+VWVjW4AfbtvYEQFUfOi15MXq0x1OfHQtwJzjT98Mi5qljsWkNX8a 3CyHmvFtg/fAX1O/TlxVPYGzjyPD+UvTV4ZDfPaB0JbZEFtJzZ3NWZk263pkbuhYMXHH mFmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778622908; x=1779227708; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9nTYItNBEtJamr9+Qzv1BppMHRb0qZCJCrUuytaYaF0=; b=DGxEW+bQLyx4zZyerL67JY08vOEj12qVvMlERWATF6GMPnx+RM7WTovQAf6nCXFZUh ExdO7gIazvo8DQ1L5T/RrrEgfAtqpjNUfTLh+3s0r4USWt7rWJ0rdgJu7dfqAoPjdCxR Oc3304Io91mjJcYJqsQEGsnK8UPCkQRSfuPCH4frREJ7pRm9ItBySMOhefXBuJu4xyG9 4m879MoZdo+C+qA8s0+CwyE+DwGEOT6a0gzZJYYPVWRT9jUtRntJ7KF4HaqDvMg0vQxt wWxWs1Yr5d9F2eGVwB7J2rXaFwJ7Y/+mOnvOEFZIwK+GxbOSeB+F5ov+26/fY7JXry9t ZZ5A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+gv2cqfXHCjJ5fqxPW3fX6NrVGdkgmMrixMG4ROvy2ANbSp5ndrojB+yESfxLPobEA+EcSBcPkzFFqJfc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzP2sQpIeVTAZoEVdEF65++wgY8ZGIm63RS16jYK4hcV9fVIkK1 MowkMISF3NKNJcqJwrj401rrJUT9rf7RanEwJtsuF+ZjByiJiMdSmPeC X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OGYadYbaFb6JtjuvxMrp7/w41j9by9iMS9WrgGUqhR/KFVtTkZOw+CSGWeNE7v rr1EM6Wa+/mVOj4dlwz+KH80to03VYaZj5bAnr0VvxU7vZfc1NV+O2cS+zBdhPqZvcPh49z/Upm T9LCntoedKu2fO0xo46/3zo7or5Q0ZQ72miWMC+BWVv01ZuHWQadNVaTS2Mo91hkrCStbWmrShp OZb8Zsr/ba4pPQYwj5OxM9lMyIif8CBP1lPl9t3Md0Yi6g5o0D6H5j8Yfg6Tihf+VAW78MeVZaW lIJcUPWiDhIiDZYM16adDKE489JwCdWggFqcPvNjzG0PFQwa8ld/GmC5sY8gSFN4d114VQMzScJ IjHm+2z818xtusteDHWxSRgLpSzM9WjakqBWe1ZG5ed9lVh6q3kzdVqYBal33EWm/CI4UNPRvyd 2vyihBD1+XhmK1Q9Fyz7Lq/w036T5Q5C/aLYPVslhBe8BjRpIg5vfXHfbPv5Lw/oRkX1dpr1U7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:37c3:b0:368:3d3e:efa6 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-368f3f87c51mr696927a91.20.1778622908222; Tue, 12 May 2026 14:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r912.lan.4v1.in ([182.70.116.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2baf1d52f27sm180335295ad.36.2026.05.12.14.55.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 May 2026 14:55:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Avinash Duduskar To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de, phil@nwl.cc, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: nf_conntrack_proto_tcp: fix typos in comments Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 03:25:01 +0530 Message-ID: <20260512215501.1988242-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Fix three typos in comments: - "migth"/"Migth" -> "might" (two adjacent occurrences in the tcp_conntracks[] state-transition table comment block). - "agaist" -> "against" (tcp_error() header comment). - "intrepretated" -> "interpreted" (RFC 5961 challenge-ACK marker comment in nf_conntrack_tcp_packet()). Signed-off-by: Avinash Duduskar --- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c index b67426c2189b..47dc6edb4431 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c @@ -169,14 +169,14 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = { /*fin*/ { sIV, sIV, sFW, sFW, sLA, sLA, sLA, sTW, sCL, sIV }, /* * sNO -> sIV Too late and no reason to do anything... - * sSS -> sIV Client migth not send FIN in this state: + * sSS -> sIV Client might not send FIN in this state: * we enforce waiting for a SYN/ACK reply first. * sS2 -> sIV * sSR -> sFW Close started. * sES -> sFW * sFW -> sLA FIN seen in both directions, waiting for * the last ACK. - * Migth be a retransmitted FIN as well... + * Might be a retransmitted FIN as well... * sCW -> sLA * sLA -> sLA Retransmitted FIN. Remain in the same state. * sTW -> sTW @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static void tcp_error_log(const struct sk_buff *skb, nf_l4proto_log_invalid(skb, state, IPPROTO_TCP, "%s", msg); } -/* Protect conntrack agaist broken packets. Code taken from ipt_unclean.c. */ +/* Protect conntrack against broken packets. Code taken from ipt_unclean.c. */ static bool tcp_error(const struct tcphdr *th, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int dataoff, @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_tcp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct, } /* Mark the potential for RFC5961 challenge ACK, * this pose a special problem for LAST_ACK state - * as ACK is intrepretated as ACKing last FIN. + * as ACK is interpreted as ACKing last FIN. */ if (old_state == TCP_CONNTRACK_LAST_ACK) ct->proto.tcp.last_flags |= base-commit: 73d587ae684d176fac9db94173f77d78a794ea4f -- 2.54.0