From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, tj@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mgorman@suse.de, bsegall@google.com, arighi@nvidia.com,
pauld@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] sched/fair: Add sched_smt_active check for fastpaths
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 19:09:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513133934.380347-4-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513133934.380347-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
For fastpaths such as wakeup and load balance even minimal code additions
can add up. is_core_idle is accessed during load balance.
Other callsites of is_core_idle make sched_smt_active() check first.
Make the same check in should_we_balance.
Rest of access to cpu_smt_mask isn't in fastpath.
Note: Remove the stale comment above is_core_idle. Enqueue methods
of fair aren't close to it anymore.
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 353e31ecaadc..964014a74cf9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1578,10 +1578,7 @@ update_stats_curr_start(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
se->exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq_of(cfs_rq));
}
-/**************************************************
- * Scheduling class queueing methods:
- */
-
+/* Check sched_smt_active before calling this to avoid overheads in fastpaths */
static inline bool is_core_idle(int cpu)
{
int sibling;
@@ -11995,7 +11992,8 @@ static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
* balancing cores, but remember the first idle SMT CPU for
* later consideration. Find CPU on an idle core first.
*/
- if (!(env->sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) && !is_core_idle(cpu)) {
+ if (!(env->sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) &&
+ sched_smt_active() && !is_core_idle(cpu)) {
if (idle_smt == -1)
idle_smt = cpu;
/*
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 13:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] sched: Simplify CONFIG_SCHED_SMT ifdef usage Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-13 13:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] topology: Introduce cpu_smt_mask for CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-13 13:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] sched: Simplify ifdeffery around cpu_smt_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-13 13:39 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-05-13 13:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] sched: Unify SMT active check via sched_smt_active() Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513133934.380347-4-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox