From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFEB03783CE; Wed, 13 May 2026 22:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778711248; cv=none; b=hV0u4vvypo2SklKooc055+YHcBt60uaYeFO9P4VWK3j6XDwADp4QerQOXPPAA3bVJxAR0jpZMCQ+BFW/dm2YQMEjEbB2DNwM9sgQ1RT9DrAPQprUfRUuSD6yrx7lBvPG0KySFpnpio0SHWyR++J0HKP8xVviTTQGX0zzMe73yxE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778711248; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yMeTXDbCQEz8EGX5JoE/0Wc6TDDp9GFsAJU2DsCuFl8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dRf7KTsGzNp0/l4c+2ZMK3z4KeiHtIcKldyS48a0Ilb+kzJIcc5Ayo6Bl5sfrBHA4ZYji1HO7iIEVkAPHmEadgVM71Lsa3xdzuZ65eaKEqeFPM9R5xA0WENdCdnQL6PisRGRoesrG8FAdApjp3PKaRRMREL066nB3N4JaA7mA60= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=usmRqyuK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="usmRqyuK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC1CAC19425; Wed, 13 May 2026 22:27:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778711248; bh=yMeTXDbCQEz8EGX5JoE/0Wc6TDDp9GFsAJU2DsCuFl8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=usmRqyuK9pOiEvW8mB+vmkviwJba88lsn/0lKWzJt+QFxHCVq6mmr/ESnXb0hD5qE QyHC86X9bIOw3ql53AjZRDwtDpW4Vp0cMJdDolQbIpYkfPWwFwVlkc+fp38oStO5Mn vguMWBVzGCDkjVhT23lq7EKvbcFny8y+jIyghbw5NSqTJ5kh7ygHwcNfUH/Gs9LzxT 9jS9CUaTEC270aHe03fCDMC+hORO6IYt8jwHWhOSTFmZydaAhNSd+zDjnnjWrdhDMv o3YWKb/5FLf64ufkpeASVLMyJIctLWNE/CiSxbqTCRmM+F0hzMyCGnX48VmC9k1ZqQ lBcwEPGn3yoMw== Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 17:27:25 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Tommaso Merciai Cc: tomm.merciai@gmail.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com, David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Philipp Zabel , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/13] dt-bindings: display: renesas,rzg2l-du: Add support for RZ/G3E SoC Message-ID: <20260513222725.GA2069022-robh@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > The RZ/G3E SoC integrates two LCD controllers (LCDC0 and LCDC1), each > containing a FCPVD, VSPD, and Display Unit (DU). > > - LCDC0 supports DSI and LVDS (single or dual-channel) outputs. > - LCDC1 supports DSI, LVDS (single-channel), and RGB outputs. > > Add compatible string 'renesas,r9a09g047-du' and extend the binding to > support two DU instances: add reg-names ('du0'/'du1'), extend reg, > interrupts, and resets to maxItems: 2, and extend clocks/clock-names to > six entries (aclk/pclk/vclk per instance, minItems: 3). Don't write what the diff has. I can read the diff for that. > > Drop the "Each port shall have a single endpoint." constraint since > RZ/G3E ports expose multiple endpoints. > > Add a RZ/G3E-specific allOf rule mapping two DU instances to two ports: > > - port@0 (DU0): endpoint@0 DSI, endpoint@2 LVDS ch0, endpoint@3 LVDS ch1 > - port@1 (DU1): endpoint@0 DSI, endpoint@1 RGB (DPAD), endpoint@3 LVDS ch1 > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai > --- > v6->v7: > - Rebased on top of [1] > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260429170012.366537-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/ > - Use single DRM device aggregating both DU instances (1 DU dt node), > modelling single port for each DU0, DU1 and multiple endpoints for > outputs. That seems like the completely wrong thing to do and you've given no reason why you think it is the right choice. Rob