The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>, linusw@kernel.org, brgl@kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 03:33:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202605140349.KZOdtI2I-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260502210354.160439-1-m32285159@gmail.com>

Hi Maxwell,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on brgl/gpio/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v7.1-rc3 next-20260508]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maxwell-Doose/gpio-twl4030-Use-guard-mutex-over-manual-locking/20260513-231548
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260502210354.160439-1-m32285159%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking
config: arc-randconfig-002-20260514 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260514/202605140349.KZOdtI2I-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arc-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260514/202605140349.KZOdtI2I-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605140349.KZOdtI2I-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c: In function 'twl_get':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c:310:6: warning: unused variable 'ret' [-Wunused-variable]
     int ret;
         ^~~


vim +/ret +310 drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c

e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  306  
e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  307  static int twl_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  308  {
231a8680b78260f drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Linus Walleij  2015-12-07  309  	struct gpio_twl4030_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
c111feabe2e200b drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-20 @310  	int ret;
e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  311  	int status = 0;
e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  312  
b833f746820a65c drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Maxwell Doose  2026-05-02  313  	guard(mutex)(&priv->mutex);
c111feabe2e200b drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-20  314  	if (!(priv->usage_count & BIT(offset))) {
b833f746820a65c drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Maxwell Doose  2026-05-02  315  		return -EPERM;
c111feabe2e200b drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-20  316  	}
72c7901ef00925c drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-06  317  
c111feabe2e200b drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-20  318  	if (priv->direction & BIT(offset))
c111feabe2e200b drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-20  319  		status = priv->out_state & BIT(offset);
e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  320  	else
c111feabe2e200b drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-20  321  		status = twl4030_get_gpio_datain(offset);
72c7901ef00925c drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Peter Ujfalusi 2012-12-06  322  
b833f746820a65c drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c Maxwell Doose  2026-05-02  323  	return (status < 0) ? status : !!status;
e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  324  }
e9d359471dfed51 drivers/gpio/twl4030-gpio.c David Brownell 2008-10-20  325  

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260502210354.160439-1-m32285159@gmail.com>
2026-05-04 12:49 ` [PATCH] gpio: twl4030: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-04 13:05   ` Maxwell Doose
2026-05-13 19:33 ` kernel test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202605140349.KZOdtI2I-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m32285159@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox