From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org
Cc: dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com, tglx@kernel.org,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, mingo@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 09/12] iio: ssp_sensors: use guard() to release mutexes
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 23:10:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515174017.3962168-10-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515174017.3962168-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com>
From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Replace explicit mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() with the guard() macro
for cleaner and safer mutex handling.
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
---
drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c | 47 ++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
index ebcda6de56c4..29bc3d48c42f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*/
#include "ssp.h"
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#define SSP_DEV (&data->spi->dev)
#define SSP_GET_MESSAGE_TYPE(data) ((data) & (3 << SSP_RW))
@@ -180,9 +181,8 @@ static inline void ssp_pending_add(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
if (no_irq)
return;
- mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
- mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
}
static inline void ssp_pending_del(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
@@ -191,9 +191,8 @@ static inline void ssp_pending_del(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
if (no_irq)
return;
- mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
list_del(&msg->list);
- mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
}
static int __ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
@@ -204,17 +203,20 @@ static int __ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
/* msg->done must be initialized by caller */
WARN_ON(!msg->done);
- mutex_lock(&data->comm_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->comm_lock);
status = ssp_check_lines(data, false);
- if (status < 0)
- goto _error_locked;
+ if (status < 0) {
+ data->timeout_cnt++;
+ return status;
+ }
status = spi_write(data->spi, msg->buffer, SSP_HEADER_SIZE);
if (status < 0) {
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(data->ap_mcu_gpiod, 1);
dev_err(SSP_DEV, "%s spi_write fail\n", __func__);
- goto _error_locked;
+ data->timeout_cnt++;
+ return status;
}
ssp_pending_add(data, msg, no_irq);
@@ -222,16 +224,11 @@ static int __ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
status = ssp_check_lines(data, true);
if (status < 0) {
ssp_pending_del(data, msg, no_irq);
- goto _error_locked;
+ data->timeout_cnt++;
+ return status;
}
- mutex_unlock(&data->comm_lock);
return 0;
-
-_error_locked:
- mutex_unlock(&data->comm_lock);
- data->timeout_cnt++;
- return status;
}
static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
@@ -379,12 +376,12 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
switch (msg_type) {
case SSP_AP2HUB_READ:
- case SSP_AP2HUB_WRITE:
+ case SSP_AP2HUB_WRITE: {
/*
* this is a small list, a few elements - the packets can be
* received with no order
*/
- mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, n, &data->pending_list, list) {
if (iter->options == msg_options) {
list_del(&iter->list);
@@ -400,10 +397,8 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
* check but let's handle this
*/
buffer = kmalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
- if (!buffer) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto _unlock;
- }
+ if (!buffer)
+ return -ENOMEM;
/* got dead packet so it is always an error */
ret = spi_read(data->spi, buffer, length);
@@ -415,7 +410,7 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
dev_err(SSP_DEV, "No match error %x\n",
msg_options);
- goto _unlock;
+ break;
}
if (msg_type == SSP_AP2HUB_READ)
@@ -433,16 +428,15 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
msg->length = 1;
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
- goto _unlock;
+ break;
}
}
if (msg->done)
if (!completion_done(msg->done))
complete(msg->done);
-_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
break;
+ }
case SSP_HUB2AP_WRITE:
buffer = kzalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
if (!buffer)
@@ -472,7 +466,7 @@ void ssp_clean_pending_list(struct ssp_data *data)
{
struct ssp_msg *msg, *n;
- mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, n, &data->pending_list, list) {
list_del(&msg->list);
@@ -480,7 +474,6 @@ void ssp_clean_pending_list(struct ssp_data *data)
if (!completion_done(msg->done))
complete(msg->done);
}
- mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
}
int ssp_command(struct ssp_data *data, char command, int arg)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 17:40 [PATCH v8 00/12] iio: ssp_sensors: driver fixes, refactor and cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] iio: ssp_sensors: cancel delayed work_refresh on remove Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helpers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] iio: ssp_sensors: refactor transfer logic into helper Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out MCU enable/disable helpers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] iio: ssp_sensors: use local struct device Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] iio: ssp_sensors: fix variable type and declaration order in probe() Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] iio: ssp_sensors: Drop duplicated wdt timer and work cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] iio: ssp_sensors: convert probe and teardown to devm-managed resources Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` Sanjay Chitroda [this message]
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] iio: ssp_sensors: Use dev_err_probe() Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] iio: ssp_sensors: return errors directly from ssp_irq_msg() Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] iio: ssp_sensors: reuse embedded RX buffer for SPI transfers Sanjay Chitroda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515174017.3962168-10-sanjayembedded@gmail.com \
--to=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox