From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69DC53D525B for ; Sat, 16 May 2026 11:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.47 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778932415; cv=none; b=pfhJMVA+yxencsTbQdLxekKNunzvKApp2e9GcT2xpWi9uUm9o4SVP6KOrc9jh/a3gcYTXMXa/LpbhtKa2bsrEje+jAC6R4wZPS6pC+4keyNokAJYT6RqTj7jD7Um9frkiUqfeWW7vgR2V04xnQHdpzlc+6aFXYesdGwVO29VYRs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778932415; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F7j14MGWg5MpaTs46ixVgM5+KDomqLpuWcEipt69nvI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GNwlwEpWKDuZIcTpM7pcmmy1KZJdh6HXBdLSJVg8mfN01nnscrQrqm+aQaawOrE/M8AfcJ/p2syrxzbqBj+EHg6KxI7V8QWSCFCVpPHCcsfr0577wBldQhqxMb9SEGyZXWIQXBY3XjG2olxlyWo1cBSJguOt2owrhyzA8xXctTY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=TTwzhsR5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="TTwzhsR5" Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-453903ee4adso539555f8f.3 for ; Sat, 16 May 2026 04:53:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1778932412; x=1779537212; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GMsYPxsGdmOZu2bUf9upWSruFK/hZRv7KGPN8jXsIdE=; b=TTwzhsR5nBzuTE33a4WAvIiwr/EV+I1TVkybF8WTUoYUierI7qMv6v9zrehsSQ6eIS d5J7nnW80F8TPiYRlB5IG4XsvHMyNuAK4pL00yBRNxIrAtHgkCK0foHx1jqkDCKmQ9Fd O7faNAbFNfs/TBuMmiIfnSixME52ODqs2ofPDOSn645g0Mn9fnUV+qkNlilsig2TMYC+ VpXjTRaJXZKGPkEntwW+XZGUYb7x0UESFJlrCY0jdA74Kvt/qZ0EpHz5e+RNp3Ec5cMW ZIiS7nf/w0Ks9GI2EsN9wn8Hbr7UBgOslrM7Yfyh1qTf/IYHk6lAP0pKdgklS7VlZ3di u9kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778932412; x=1779537212; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GMsYPxsGdmOZu2bUf9upWSruFK/hZRv7KGPN8jXsIdE=; b=azqru0fEGvSq8l4Ll7s+jCS2cTZCYK05CzzSDbWWoHodKxxODDX8QrqRcpKowqA7+1 fMKoVv2OZlE5OgW+7r0+9KCjr502KevtW6WEiEvYqgw6ZhnHWew9s3hjDbHKCNMMX9GE hLiiRm1unYBUeDd2LZEy757JkEtT4+gzO8vPPmlmFqVBpy5RWio1DG7jxIWxQeNVhk9A /Xr5yqAtg7gZiPF85nk8dLdd7+o3Uru1iE01IaEiQzUw7WELXcvJEoKpw6ywetl/zDef TqoZmH/sdDOqsFQPl4jbRF2umm0ga2Wqia0L0kHHDKafibziMG965xgWz5GKZBcCEEa/ jy5A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+2pgGmnl+5/0rJFPtRnDLi5U/A6N7hjZhZoLoS5T2v/XqQwQnHXvu1sdcRLuYbnA0PhiMnCKiB8VOLX6U=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxfy1rpegmMZHR2UBo+FJDp1QFY71YW74DjuWX8QBlwt/uemCSf ER6LRRlZS3+b5MtI0R5QuiYg0eaUAseBcETUlEms1XxfSwUSbr/JEl4+ X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OHz0Ngea/n5i9mQfnifxkHQr/Lbv0lwolbcRjVTSXlCDpY0spS4rxcvqMI/U3K +0HvffAlW6gtVNqmOBCECMbkvGbNm9S7cMiHmYnRBdVgciqO2a9frNoVSC7ikKN4yAa59vCnHPo 1RzI0aPl/CLG5S8ZUmmk0AiaIFW05K4TNwEr0THnzJoGgtxN1hIe0udkSOa28A0sLb5IwJKC/je nFFE+c0DsXadRrVDfQ1bz/VOPq87LSNNNV90vmxFfM+ZLQUjqUUREZl5InmBXR0hmStbo5X+BVy bzwurgjfQ3OQJ0qZ7cte7Vz+v+jha3SP3e8WSyjR15qRAJgRwPR5apy56g+7PQ4u1GnsgPt+Ijz k9ZaD4PM/eUsqIw/aVJaxN/WLf1YvEgrE6Vq/2vCQNUBDhPlFPnXOMCnyvSICr7nzTZVYWsylC4 JkzsQ+ZSdvDZRUIv9mi97ZOQE6yvISDwNKctKCie5e7hlk7GA5SDzc3D1vnhMB X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:288e:b0:45d:7bf0:c7d3 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-45e5c37122emr10808299f8f.19.1778932411691; Sat, 16 May 2026 04:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-45da15a6454sm22250671f8f.34.2026.05.16.04.53.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 May 2026 04:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 12:53:29 +0100 From: David Laight To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Arseniy Krasnov , Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Eugenio =?UTF-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Xuan Zhuo , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "David S. Miller" , Jason Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maher Azzouzi Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: fix zerocopy completion for multi-skb sends Message-ID: <20260516125329.7b699c6f@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: <20260514092948.268720-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> References: <20260514092948.268720-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:29:48 +0200 Stefano Garzarella wrote: > From: Stefano Garzarella > > When a large message is fragmented into multiple skbs, the zerocopy > uarg is only allocated and attached to the last skb in the loop. > Non-final skbs carry pinned user pages with no completion tracking, > so the kernel has no way to notify userspace when those pages are safe > to reuse. If the loop breaks early the uarg is never allocated at all, > leaking pinned pages with no completion notification. > > Fix this by following the approach used by TCP: allocate the zerocopy > uarg (if not provided by the caller) before the send loop and attach > it to every skb via skb_zcopy_set(), which takes a reference per skb. > Each skb's completion properly decrements the refcount, and the > notification only fires after the last skb is freed. > On failure, if no data was sent, the uarg is cleanly aborted via > net_zcopy_put_abort(). > > This issue was initially discovered by sashiko while reviewing commit > 1cb36e252211 ("vsock/virtio: fix MSG_ZEROCOPY pinned-pages accounting") > but was pre-existing. > > Fixes: 581512a6dc93 ("vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support") > Cc: Arseniy Krasnov > Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260420132051.217589-1-sgarzare%40redhat.com > Reported-by: Maher Azzouzi > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella > --- > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 83 ++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > index 989cc252d3d3..1e3409d28164 100644 > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > @@ -70,34 +70,6 @@ static bool virtio_transport_can_zcopy(const struct virtio_transport *t_ops, > return true; > } > > -static int virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > - struct sk_buff *skb, > - struct msghdr *msg, > - size_t pkt_len, > - bool zerocopy) > -{ > - struct ubuf_info *uarg; > - > - if (msg->msg_ubuf) { > - uarg = msg->msg_ubuf; > - net_zcopy_get(uarg); > - } else { > - struct ubuf_info_msgzc *uarg_zc; > - > - uarg = msg_zerocopy_realloc(sk_vsock(vsk), > - pkt_len, NULL, false); > - if (!uarg) > - return -1; > - > - uarg_zc = uarg_to_msgzc(uarg); > - uarg_zc->zerocopy = zerocopy ? 1 : 0; > - } > - > - skb_zcopy_init(skb, uarg); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > static int virtio_transport_fill_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, > struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info, > size_t len, > @@ -317,8 +289,10 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > u32 src_cid, src_port, dst_cid, dst_port; > const struct virtio_transport *t_ops; > struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs; > + struct ubuf_info *uarg = NULL; > u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len; > bool can_zcopy = false; > + bool have_uref = false; > u32 rest_len; > int ret; > > @@ -360,6 +334,25 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > if (can_zcopy) > max_skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, > (MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE)); > + > + if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY && > + info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) { > + uarg = info->msg->msg_ubuf; > + > + if (!uarg) { > + uarg = msg_zerocopy_realloc(sk_vsock(vsk), > + pkt_len, NULL, false); > + if (!uarg) { > + virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + if (!can_zcopy) > + uarg_to_msgzc(uarg)->zerocopy = 0; > + > + have_uref = true; > + } > + } Surely that block should only be done if can_zcopy is true? And shouldn't something unset it if info->op != VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW ? If the msg_zerocopy_realloc() fails then can't you just set can_zcopy to false. It info->msg->msg_buf is already set then I think you have to disable zero-copy. The caller has already requested a callback - and you can't add another. In any case by the end of this can_zcopy and have_uref are really the same flag. > } > > rest_len = pkt_len; > @@ -378,27 +371,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > break; > } > > - /* We process buffer part by part, allocating skb on > - * each iteration. If this is last skb for this buffer > - * and MSG_ZEROCOPY mode is in use - we must allocate > - * completion for the current syscall. > - * > - * Pass pkt_len because msg iter is already consumed > - * by virtio_transport_fill_skb(), so iter->count > - * can not be used for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK pinned-pages > - * accounting done by msg_zerocopy_realloc(). > - */ > - if (info->msg && info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY && > - skb_len == rest_len && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) { > - if (virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb(vsk, skb, > - info->msg, > - pkt_len, > - can_zcopy)) { > - kfree_skb(skb); > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - break; > - } > - } > + skb_zcopy_set(skb, uarg, NULL); > > virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb); > > @@ -422,6 +395,18 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > > virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len); > > + /* msg_zerocopy_realloc() initializes the ubuf_info refcnt to 1. > + * skb_zcopy_set() increases it for each skb, so we can drop that ^ must > + * initial reference to keep it balanced. > + */ > + if (have_uref) { > + if (rest_len == pkt_len) > + /* No data sent, abort the notification. */ > + net_zcopy_put_abort(uarg, true); Is it worth optimising for the 'nothing sent' case ? -- David > + else > + net_zcopy_put(uarg); > + } > + > /* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */ > if (rest_len != pkt_len) > ret = pkt_len - rest_len;