From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: sj1557.seo@samsung.com, yuezhang.mo@sony.com, brauner@kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, anmuxixixi@gmail.com,
dxdt@dev.snart.me, chizhiling@kylinos.cn, chizhiling@163.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, charsyam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] iomap: introduce IOMAP_F_ZERO_TAIL flag
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:03:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518160356.GH9568@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518114705.9601-2-linkinjeon@kernel.org>
On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 08:46:55PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> In filesystems that maintain a separate Valid Data Length, such as exFAT
> and NTFS, a partial write may start at or beyond the current valid_size and
> extend it. In this case, the region after the previous valid_size but
> within the same filesystem block is considered unwritten.
>
> This patch introduces IOMAP_F_ZERO_TAIL. When this flag is set in iomap,
> __iomap_write_begin() will zero only the tail portion while preserving any
> valid data before it in the same block.
>
> Without this tail zeroing, stale data in the unwritten portion of the block
> can remain in the page cache. Subsequent reads can then return incorrect
> contents from that region.
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
AFAICT, the "valid size" means "all space between valid_size and i_size
is unwritten", and that's why you need the tail of the block to be
zeroed, right?
So if, say, the fsblock size is 4k and valid_size is 80k; and I initiate
a pwrite of 300 bytes at 121k, exfat will do its own zeroing to bump
valid_size up to 121k, right? Then the actual iomap_write call will
copy the 300 bytes into the pagecache, and now it needs ZERO_TAIL to
zero the rest of the pagecache from (121k + 300) to 124k, correct?
(What I'm probing for is, there's no need for a ZERO_HEAD at this time
because exfat has to take care of that, right?)
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 4 ++++
> include/linux/iomap.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index d7b648421a70..44046c648df4 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -836,6 +836,7 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> return -EIO;
> folio_zero_segments(folio, poff, from, to, poff + plen);
> } else {
> + const struct iomap *iomap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
> int status;
>
> if (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
> @@ -853,6 +854,9 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> len, status, GFP_NOFS);
> if (status)
> return status;
> +
> + if (iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_ZERO_TAIL)
> + folio_zero_segment(folio, to, poff + plen);
> }
> iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
> } while ((block_start += plen) < block_end);
> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> index 2c5685adf3a9..750602e18750 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ struct vm_fault;
> * bio, i.e. set REQ_ATOMIC.
> *
> * IOMAP_F_INTEGRITY indicates that the filesystems handles integrity metadata.
> + *
> + * IOMAP_F_ZERO_TAIL indicates the remainder of the block after the data
> + * written should be zeroed.
> */
> #define IOMAP_F_NEW (1U << 0)
> #define IOMAP_F_DIRTY (1U << 1)
> @@ -86,6 +89,7 @@ struct vm_fault;
> #else
> #define IOMAP_F_INTEGRITY 0
> #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */
> +#define IOMAP_F_ZERO_TAIL (1U << 10)
>
> /*
> * Flag reserved for file system specific usage
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 11:46 [PATCH v4 00/11] exfat: convert to iomap Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] iomap: introduce IOMAP_F_ZERO_TAIL flag Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 16:03 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-05-19 3:32 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-05-22 12:53 ` Christian Brauner
2026-05-22 15:02 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] exfat: replace unsafe macros with static inline functions Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] exfat: add balloc parameter to exfat_map_cluster() for iomap support Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] exfat: add exfat_file_open() Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] exfat: add support for multi-cluster allocation Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] exfat: add data_start_bytes and exfat_cluster_to_phys_bytes() helper Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] exfat: fix implicit declaration of brelse() Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] exfat: add iomap buffered I/O support Namjae Jeon
2026-05-19 5:21 ` Yuezhang.Mo
2026-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] exfat: add iomap direct " Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] exfat: add support for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA in llseek Namjae Jeon
2026-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] exfat: make exfat_truncate() return error code Namjae Jeon
2026-05-19 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] exfat: convert to iomap Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-19 4:05 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-05-19 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-19 7:45 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-05-22 12:53 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518160356.GH9568@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=anmuxixixi@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=charsyam@gmail.com \
--cc=chizhiling@163.com \
--cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=dxdt@dev.snart.me \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox